Housabai W/o Gahininath Pawar vs State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1615

SANDEEP V. MARNE
Housabai W/o Gahininath Pawar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: P.V. Ambade.
For the Respondent: S.N. Morampalle.

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, heard finally at admission stage.

2. By fling these writ petitions, an attempt is made to infuse life into dead claims fled by Petitioners for enhancement of compensation. Various orders passed by Civil Judge Sr. Division, Omerga rejecting Petitioners’ respective Land Acquisition References on account of their default to remain present are the subject matter of challenge in the present petitions.

3. Following are the details of the proceedings initiated by petitioners and dates on which they have been dismissed:

S. No.	Writ Petition No.	LAR No.	LAR Dismissed on
1.	W.P. No. 718 of 2022	238 of 1994 renumbered as 252 of 2004	2.5.2008
2.	W.P. No. 719 of 2022	47 of 2000 renumbered as 1333 of 2009	4.3.2014
3.	W.P. No. 728 of 2022	26 of 1996 renumbered as 401 of 2004	31.1.2009
4.	W.P. No. 730 of 2022	11 of 1996 renumbered as 387 of 2004	31.1.2009

4. Challenging the aforesaid orders rejecting their LARs, present petitions

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1615

SANDEEP V. MARNEHousabai W/o Gahininath Pawar – AppellantVersusState of Maharashtra – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

SANDEEP V. MARNE
Housabai W/o Gahininath Pawar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent