Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
MANGESH S. PATIL, SANDEEP V. MARNE
Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Hon’ble Cabinet Minister For Co-operation, Marketing and Textile Department – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
A. The Challenge
In these petitions, we are tasked upon to decide the competing claims of the Petitioner-Bank towards interest on credit facilities extended to the society which has gone in liquidation during period of its liquidation and that of the workers of that society for their unpaid wages. Since the amount available with the official assignee after monetization of assets of the society is limited, both parties stake priority for their respective claims over that amount. Petitioner-Bank challenges the order passed by State Government rejecting its claim for interest during period of liquidation of the society. It also challenges the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Labour sanctioning the amount of wages to 322 workers of the society. Both parties claim priority to receive the amount available with the official assignee.
B. FACTS IN WRIT PETITION NO. 330 OF 2011:
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner bank lacked locus standi to challenge the workers' wage order and was not entitled to interest during the liquidation period. T....
The court established that under the MCS Act, the issuance of recovery certificates involves a summary inquiry focused on the quantification of arrears, and that disputes requiring evidence must be a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the second charge cannot be considered equivalent to the first charge for the purpose of pari passu distribution of dues under the Companies A....
The official liquidator must adjudicate and prioritize claims from workers and creditors according to statutory provisions, ensuring that dues to workers are paramount over other claims, aligning wit....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article