Back
MANGESH S. PATIL, SANDEEP V. MARNE
Neha D/o Suryakant Bhosale – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
1. Rule. Made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned Advocates for the respective parties, heard finally at the stage of admission.
2. Having been rendered surplus on 29.06.2013, Petitioner is aggrieved by her non absorption. She has sought following prayers in the petition :
C. By issuing appropriate writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in like nature, respondents may kindly be directed to make a payment of salary of petitioner since September, 2015 till this date in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.
D. By issuing appropriate writ or mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in like nature, respondent No. 3-Education Officer, Z.P. Jalna may kindly be dir
The court emphasized the importance of valid reasons for absence from duties and the necessity of available vacant posts for absorption.
The requirement of prior approval from the Education Officer for retrenchment under Rule 26 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 is mandatory, and failu....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
