SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 321

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
Sayed Mohaseen S/o. Sayad Jalal – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, through its Controller – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. R.F. Totla.
For the Respondent: Mr. A.B. Dhongade.

JUDGMENT :

1. The appellant, who is the original claimant, has challenged the dismissal of his claim i.e. M.A.C.P. No. 07 of 1999 at the hands of learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aurangabad, (hereinafter referred to as “the learned Tribunal), under judgment dated 17.11.2003. The appellant had claimed compensation of Rs.3,50,000/- on account of injuries which he sustained in the motor vehicle accident took place on 26.01.1998 at about 10.15 p.m. at Railway Station, Aurangabad.

2. According to the appellant-claimant, the accident took place on the aforesaid date at about 10.15 p.m. at Railway Station City Bus Stop at Aurangabad. At the relevant time, the appellant, in order to go to Shahganj, boarded ST Bus No.MCA-7213 but the Respondent No.2 i.e. driver of the said bus, in the absence of any signal from the conductor, abruptly started the bus and, therefore, left leg of the appellant got crushed between the footsteps of the bus and platform. The appellant fell down from the bus and became unconscious. The appellant was thereafter taken to Government Medical College

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top