SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 399

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH
ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
Dajiguru Maharaj Shetkari Dhanya Adhikosh Seva Sahakari Sanstha Marayadit And Others – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Through Tis Principal Secretary And Others – Respondents
1021 Writ Petition No.13292 Of 2022 With Writ Petition No.13123 Of 2022 With Writ Petition No.3035 Of 2023 With Writ Petition No.3567 Of 2023 With CA/4276/2023 In WP/3567/2023 With Writ Petition No.3000 Of 2023 With Writ Petition No.2996 Of 2023 With Writ Petition No.3001 Of 2023 With Writ Petition No.3570 Of 2023.
Decided On : 31-03-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. R. N. Dhorde i/b Mr. Ghatol Patil Shahaji B.
For the Respondents: Mr. K. B. Jadhavar, Mr. S. K. Kadam, Mr. P. D. Bachate.

Headnote:

Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Section 152 - Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation Act, 1963 and Rules, 1967 - Section 13 (1) (a) (i) - Applied for Registration of amended bye-laws - Rejection of societies - Petitioners are challenging order passed by respondent No.5 - Held, Petitioners have applied for Registration of amended bye-laws wherein words are inserted in object of society in bye-law No.5 for distribution of “Crop Loans”- Application for registration of amended bye-laws was pending - Thereafter, petitioners have applied to Court for a writ seeking a direction to decide application for registration of amendment in bye-laws wherein amended bye-laws would include clause for disbursal of crop loan as one of its object - Respondent No.5 authority has passed an order based on material as was available before him - Impugned order passed by respondent No.5 cannot be said to be patently illegal as regards bye-law not containing provision of “disbursal of crop loan” is concerned - Petitions relates to elections of APMC and law on interference in election process is well settled - Court would ordinarily not interfere with election process unless there is a patent illegality - Order passed by respondent No.5 is not patently illegal - It is an order based on material as was available before him at time of passing order - Thus, these petitions are disposed of with liberty to petitioners to raise their grievance before any forum as may be available in law - Petitions disposed of.

ORDER :

1. By the present writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging the order dated 12/12/2022 passed by the respondent No.5 the District Election officer (APMC) And District Dy. Registrar Cooperative Societies Parbhani.

2. The present bunch of writ petitions involve common question of law and relates to the rejection of the petitioner societies objections/claim by the respondent No.5 District Election officer (APMC, Parbhnai), for inclusion of their names in the final voters list of the APMC respondent No.6. All the petitions involve common question and hence are taken up together for disposal. The facts are taken from Writ Petition No.13292 of 2022, Dajiguru Maharaj Shetkari Dhanya Adhikosh Seva Sahakari Sanstha Marayadit, Dhnagar Talaki, Tq. Purna, Dist. Parbhani and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others.

3. Brief facts giving rise to the filing of the present writ petitions can be summarized as under :-

The petitioners societies were included in the voters list of the respondent No.6 the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Purna, Tq. Purna, Dist.Parbhani in the last elections held in the year 2016- 2017. On 08/04/2022, the Commissioner of Corporation issued a general direction for reclassification of Dhanya Adhikosh Societies as General Societies and issued further direction to accept model byelaws for all the Dhanya Adhikosh Societies. Some of the Dhanya Adhikosh Societies challenged the general direction of the Commissioner of Corporation before the Hon’ble Minister under Section 152 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. After considering the matter, the Minister rejected the revision petition filed by those petitioners. Thereafter, writ petition was filed in this Court challenging the order passed by the Minister. This Court, by common order dated 08/03/2023, in Writ Petition No.11921 of 2022 and other petitions set aside the order passed by the Hon’ble Minister so also the order passed by the Commissioner of Corporation dated 08/04/2022 so far as it was made applicable to the petitioners therein.

4. The present petitioners are similarly placed Dhanya Adhikosh Societies to those petitioners in Writ Petition No.11921 of 2022. During the pendency of the above Writ Petition No.11921 of 2022 before the High Court, the respondent No.5 issued programme for finalization of voters list of respondent No.6 (APMC). Provisional voters list was published on 21/11/2022, and claims and objections were invited up till 30/11/2022. The date for decision on claim and objection was scheduled on 12/12/2022 and the final voters list was published on 19/12/2022. On 25/11/2022 the petitioner societies raised objection to the provisional voters list as their names were not included in the provisional voters list. In their support, the petitioner societies produced its bye-laws and contended that the petitioners are Resource societies with sub-classification of agricultural resource societies. The petitioners have also contended that they have an object of giving crop loans to its members. They have also disbursed crop loan to its members.

5. On 19/12/2022, the respondent No.5 passed order on the objections raised by the petitioners and published final voters list of the APMC, thereby rejecting the objections raised by the petitioners. By the impugned orders dated 19/12/2022, the respondent No.5 primarily accepted the report given by the Sub-Registrar of Cooperative Societies wherein it was observed :-

(a) There is a general direction issued by the Commissioner of corporation on 08/04/2022 to reclassify the societies as general societies, and that the Hon’ble Minister of Corporation has dismissed appeal filed under Section 152 of MCS Act. The said order is challenged before the High Court by filing writ petitions, however, the High Court had not granted Stay, and as such, the societies are classified as general societies.

(b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top