G. A. SANAP
Deepak S/o Ramdeo Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G.A. SANAP, J.
1. In this criminal application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.PC”), the applicant-accused has questioned the correctness of the order dated 24th October, 2018, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Tirora, whereby the learned Magistrate rejected the application made by the applicant-accused for his discharge in Regular Criminal Case No. 11 of 2016.
2. The facts relevant for the purpose of deciding this application are as follows:
B. Suresh Yadav vs. Sharifa Bee and Another
Dalip Kaur and Others vs. Jagnar Singh and Another
M. Krishnan vs. Vijay Singh and Another
M.S. Sheriff, P.C. Damodaran Nair vs. State of Madras
Merino Leathers Pvt. Ltd. and Another vs. Wentzel and Schmit Gmbh and Another
Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi vs. Jitendra Bhimraj Bijjaya and Others
Sajjan Kumar vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Tarun Jit Tejpal vs. State of Goa and Another
Vijay Kumar Ghai and Others vs. State of West Bengal and Others
The intention of the accused at the inception of the transaction and the sufficiency of material to frame the charge against the accused were the central legal points established in the judgment.
The main legal point established is that the intention to deceive and the misrepresentation of crucial information can constitute the offense of cheating under IPC Section 420, and the availability o....
The court found that a civil dispute may constitute a criminal offence under S.420 IPC if fraudulent intent is present, and the mere existence of a civil remedy does not warrant quashing criminal pro....
Criminal proceedings cannot proceed where allegations only constitute a civil dispute without intent to cheat.
Civil disputes should not be framed as criminal offences when no fraudulent intent is evident, as it constitutes an abuse of legal processes.
The court ruled that criminal proceedings based on civil disputes without clear fraudulent intent are an abuse of process, necessitating dismissal of such charges.
The court affirmed that a party only involved in a civil contract cannot face criminal liability unless it directly transacted or misappropriated funds, supporting the need for a clear distinction be....
FIR is an abuse of process of law and/or the same has been lodged only to harass the accused, the same can be quashed in exercise of powers vested under Article 226 of the Constitution or in exercise....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of establishing fraudulent or dishonest intention at the beginning of a transaction to constitute the offence of cheating under ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.