DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, KAMAL KHATA
Aditi Constructions – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – 1 (3) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
KAMAL KHATA, J.
1. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the notice under section (u/s) 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) dated 9th March 2015 issued by Respondent No.1 for reopening of assessment for assessment year (‘A.Y.’) 2008-09 and the order dated 21st January 2016, rejecting the objections raised by Petitioner to the notice issued to re-assess the income.
2. Rule was issued on 16th April 2016. No reply filed till date.
FACTS:
3. Petitioner a partnership firm filed its return of income for AY 2008-09 on 15th September 2008. It’s case was selected for scrutiny and a Notice u/s 143(2) was issued on 19th August 2009. Thereafter, by a notice u/s 142(1) dated 12th July 2010 a questionnaire seeking details regarding loans and advances of secured and unsecured loans with names /address details, interest payment, loan confirmation details of unsecured loans, details of source and capacity of creditor, complete address of creditor with PAN and bank statements were sought. All queries were answered with particulars and supporting documents. An assessment order u/s 143(3) was passed on 29th October 2010.
4. After four years, Respondent No.1 i
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the jurisdictional conditions for invoking section 147 – 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 must be satisfied, and there should be no failure to ....
The court emphasized the requirement for the AO to have a valid 'reason to believe' that income has escaped assessment due to failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for asse....
The power to reopen assessments under Section 147 of the IT Act is much wider post-1st April, 1989, but must be based on tangible material and have a live link with the formation of belief.
The court emphasized the need for tangible material to believe that income had escaped assessment and held that the power to grant approval for re-opening an assessment is coupled with a duty and can....
Reopening of assessment under the Income Tax Act requires tangible new material; mere change of opinion is insufficient.
Reopening of assessment under the Income Tax Act after four years is impermissible without failure to disclose material facts; mere change of opinion does not justify such action.
The main legal point established is that there must be a rational connection or live link between the material coming to the notice of the Income-tax Officer and the formation of his belief that ther....
The judgment established the importance of tangible material and the prohibition of a mere change of opinion in the exercise of power under section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
Reopening of assessment under Section 148 is impermissible if the issues were previously examined under Section 263 without fresh material.
The Assessing Officer must establish the jurisdictional requirement for reopening and cannot rely solely on information without verifying if the issue had been disclosed during the original assessmen....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.