MADHAV J. JAMDAR
Radheshyam Jangad – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Pralhad Sakla W/o Late Pralhad Narayan Sakla – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
1. In Writ Petition No. 4002 of 2023 the challenge is to the legality and validity of order dated 1st August 2022 passed by the learned Judge, Small Causes Court at Mumbai (Bandra Branch) below Exhibit-33 in R.A.E. & R. Suit No. 374/528 of 2011. The said application was filed by Plaintiffs i.e. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 seeking leave for production of additional documents under Order XIII Rule 1, 4 and 7 and Order XVI Rule 6 and 7 of C.P.C. By impugned order, the learned Trial Court allowed the said application. Thus, production of documents were allowed and the said suit was adjourned for hearing on admissibility of documents. The order impugned in other Writ Petitions is also similar.
2. These Writ Petitions were heard in the morning session on 30th March 2023 and were rejected. As by the impugned order, merely production of documents were allowed and matter was kept for hearing on admissibility of documents it is observed in order dated 30th March 2023 that there is no prejudice caused to the Petitioners and therefore, interference under Article 227
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.