IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Abhay Ahuja, J.
Asha Vasanta Kajale – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
First Appeal No. 67 of 2018
Decided On : 19-12-2022
Railway Tribunal Act - Compensation - Sec. 123(c), Sec. 124A - The court discussed the provisions of Sec. 123(c) and Sec. 124A of the Railways Act and their interpretation in the context of the deceased being a bonafide passenger and dying in an untoward incident. The court emphasized the burden of proof on the claimant, the relevance of circumstantial evidence, and the liberal interpretation of the law to provide compensation in railway accidents.
Fact of the Case:
The deceased, Ganesh, fell down from a running train and died in an untoward incident. The Railway Claims Tribunal rejected the claim of the appellants, stating that the deceased was not a bonafide passenger as no ticket was found on his body.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the deceased was a bonafide passenger and died in an untoward incident, entitling the appellants to compensation under Sec. 124A of the Railways Act.
Issues: The main issue was whether the deceased was a bonafide passenger and whether his death qualified as an untoward incident under the Railways Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the relevance of circumstantial evidence, the burden of proof on the claimant, and the liberal interpretation of the law to provide compensation in railway accidents.
Final Decision: The impugned judgment was set aside, and the appellants were awarded a compensation of Rs.8,00,000.00, to be distributed equally among them.
JUDGMENT
1. This is an appeal filed under Sec. 23 of the Railway Tribunal Act, 1987, by the father, mother and brother of the deceased Ganesh Vasanta Kajale, being aggrieved by the judgment passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur dtd. 22/11/2016 dismissing the claim of the applicants.
2. Earlier, the appellants had filed claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal on the death of Ganesh, purportedly, in an untoward incident that occurred on 8/2/2014. It is the claim of the appellants that the deceased Ganesh, having deep faith in Sant Gajanan Maharaj of Shegaon, left his home at Vakodi on 8/2/2014 to go to Shegaon for darshan of Gajanan Maharaj. That, during his return journey, he accidentally fell down in between Shegaon and Jalamb station, District Buldhana, near kilometer 545/33 and died on the spot, in an untoward incident.
3. It is submitted that the deceased Ganesh did not inform anybody that he was going to Shegaon. So his family members were waiting for his return but he did not return even on the next day. Thereafter, his family members and his father and his relatives tried to search him but did not find him anywhere. However, in the evening of 9/2/2014, one person in the village came to the house of the deceased and informed that on 8/2/2014, he had seen Ganesh sitting in the auto beside the railway station at Shegaon. It is submitted that, after this, on 10/2/2014, the father and a cousin of the deceased Ganesh left for Shegaon on motorcycle in search of Ganesh. They enquired at Nandura bus stand, Khamgaon railway station and many other places and finally reached Shegaon. After reaching Shegaon, the father and cousin enquired at the temple, Anand Sagar and many hotels showing the photograph of the deceased Ganesh but they did not get any clue. It is submitted that, at that time, the cousin of the deceased, Santosh Kajale, informed that one person from Shegaon had informed him that, he had found documents besides the railway line in between Shegaon to Jalamb, in a pouch which belongs to the deceased. That, there was PAN card bearing the name of Ganesh, his Driving license, his ATM card of Bank of India as well as IDBI bank, his Election card, his Identity card of NCC Matoshree Cotton Pvt. Ltd., Nandura Road, NH6 Malkapur and one sim card of Reliance company was found on him, although no journey ticket was recovered. It is submitted that, thereafter, the father and cousin visited the spot where the documents were found, and thereafter they went to the railway police station and City police, Shegaon for enquiry, after which, they received the information that on 8/2/2014, there was an accidental death which occurred at Shegaon railway station. Thereafter, the police sent them to Yashwant photo studio, Shegaon to see the photos of the deceased. Both of them went to the said photo studio and identified the photographs of the deceased Ganesh. Upon return, one Subhash Kharate informed that on 8/2/2014, he had met Ganesh at the temple of Gajanan Maharaj and he accompanied him upto the railway station Shegaon and purchased a railway ticket of Rs.45.00 for him and boarded him in the Amravati - Mumbai Express in a general bogie and then left for his sister's home, as the electrical fitting work there was not complete. It is submitted that, thereafter, Prakash Kharate also gave his statement on 14/2/2014 at Shegaon Police Station. On this basis, the appellants submitted their claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal at Nagpur.
4. Mr. Bagul, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that the appellants are entitled for compensation on account of the death of Ganesh, who accidentally fell down in between Shegaon and Jalamb station near kilometer 545/33 and died in an untoward incident. He submits that, as all the police papers clearly indicate that it is a railway accident and his postmortem report also clearly mentions the severe crush injuries and that the death was due to railway cutting and due to in
The main legal point established is the liberal interpretation of the law to provide compensation in railway accidents, emphasizing the relevance of circumstantial evidence and the burden of proof on....
The interpretation of the Railways Act, specifically regarding the definition of a bonafide passenger and the criteria for an untoward incident, was the central legal point established in the judgmen....
The burden of proving an untoward incident is on the claimants, and they must provide sufficient evidence to establish the deceased's status as a bonafide passenger to claim compensation under Sectio....
The incident of falling under a moving train constituted an untoward incident, entitling the appellants to compensation under Section 124-A of the Railways Act.
The deceased was a bonafide passenger and his death was caused in an untoward incident, entitling the claimants to compensation.
Mere absence of ticket does not negate bonafide passenger status; affidavit suffices to discharge burden. Falling from running train is untoward incident under no-fault liability, entitling dependent....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.