IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Vibha Kankanwadi, Abhay S.Waghwase, JJ.
Shaikh Pasha – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Application No. 2423 of 2020
Decided On : 19-12-2022
ABETMENT - Criminal Law - Ss. 376, 506 of IPC - Sec. 482 of Cr.P.C. - The court discussed the scope and exercise of inherent powers under Sec. 482 of Cr.P.C. and referred to the legal position established in the cases of Inder Mohan Goswami and Anr. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and Ors. and Mahendra K.C. Vs. State of Karnataka and Another. The court found that the sexual encounters between the accused and the informant were consensual and that the FIR was lodged with an oblique motive, leading to the abuse of the process of law. The court, therefore, quashed the FIR and the consequential proceedings.
Fact of the Case:
The informant, a married woman, alleged that the accused, a friend of her husband, had forcible sexual intercourse with her on multiple occasions. She also claimed that the accused assured to marry her but did not keep his promise.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the sexual encounters were consensual and that the FIR was lodged with an oblique motive. It concluded that the initiation of criminal proceedings amounted to an abuse of the process of law.
Issues: The issues revolved around the nature of the sexual encounters, the alleged promise to marry, and the motive behind lodging the FIR.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the legal principle that a false promise to marry, given in bad faith and with no intention of being adhered to at the time it was given, could vitiate the consent of a woman in cases of sexual relations.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR and the consequential proceedings, granting the relief as prayed by the applicant.
JUDGMENT
ABHAY S.WAGHWASE, J. - The FIR at the instance of respondent no.2 bearing No. 182 of 2020 registered with Peth Beed Police Station, Taluka and District Beed for the offence punishable under Ss. 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, "IPC") and the consequential proceedings arising out of it, are both sought to be quashed by the applicants herein praying to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, "Cr.P.C.").
FACTS IN BRIEF
2. Respondent no.2 set law in motion informing Peth Beed Police Station that the accused-applicant was a friend of her husband and was regularly accompanying her husband to their house. Accused-applicant was taking chances to talk to her on one or other count. According to informant, in September-October 2015, finding her alone in the house, he entered the house on the pretext of some talks and then threatened her and had forcible intercourse with her. According to her, because of the threats, she did not inform anyone. For the entire year 2015-2016, taking disadvantage of her loneliness in house, he used to have forcible sexual intercourse. According to her, her husband suspected about it and therefore, when he questioned her, she disclosed him that accused-applicant used to have forcible sexual intercourse with her. On getting knowledge about it, her husband finally gave her divorce on 21/8/2016. Thereafter, she claims that accused-applicant assured to marry her and took her to an Advocate and some writing work was done on a bond paper. Thereafter, assuming her to be wife of applicant, she moved with him to various places. According to her, they both lived together and posed themselves to be husband and wife. Subsequently, he started avoiding her. Thereafter, apart from seeking maintenance, she lodged the above FIR on the strength of which, Peth Beed Police Station registered crime for above offence and police machinery swung into action and carried out investigation and filed charge-sheet.
The above crime as well as charge-sheet arising out of the same, both are now sought to be quashed at the hands of this Court by way of instant proceedings.
SUBMISSIONS
3. Learned counsel for the applicant, in support of relief, has pointed out that informant was already a married lady with children. That there is no dispute that present applicant was friend of her husband. That initially there was mere acquaintance, but subsequently there were several consensual sexual encounters between them. There was no threat or forcible sexual intercourse by the applicant with her. Rather according to him, all episodes were with consent. He submitted that present attempt of lodging false FIR is with mere intention to blackmail the applicant. That, informant is habitual blackmailer. Even her father has admitted about her said conduct. He pointed out that even present applicant had instituted proceedings for offence under Sec. 420 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, "IPC") against her. He took us through the papers to that extent placed on record and would add that probably getting annoyed by the same, with oblique motive, instant FIR has been lodged. He also submitted that several proceedings were instituted by the informant but she herself withdrew the same. That there was no offence as alleged in the FIR and as the same is with ill motive and after inordinate delay of two years, he submits that, in the light of such material on record, the said FIR and the investigation in consequence of it needs to be quashed and set aside.
4. While opposing the above application, learned APP would submit that the offence is serious. On the pretext of promise to marry, the applicant had indulged in several sexual encounters by threatening her. He submits that taking disadvantage of loneliness of the informant, the applicant, who was friend of her husband, threatened and had forcible relations with her. When this came to the knowledge of her husband, he gave her talaq. It is
The legal principle established was that consensual sexual encounters and a false promise to marry, given in bad faith, could vitiate the consent of a woman in cases of sexual relations.
The court emphasized the need to prevent abuse of the legal process and ensure that the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. serves the ends of justice.
The inherent powers of the court can quash criminal proceedings when the victim expresses no desire to proceed, especially following reconciliation and marriage, despite serious charges under IPC.
The significance of consent in cases of alleged rape and the distinction between false promises and breach of promises.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to prevent the abuse of the process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases where criminal proceedings are maliciously ....
It is necessary to examine FIR, statement recorded under Section 161 and 164 of Cr.P.C. before Judicial Magistrate First Class to find out correct factual matrix of issue - Sum and substance of decis....
Consent in sexual relations must be informed and free from misconceptions; a promise of marriage made after the fact does not vitiate consent if the relationship was consensual and ongoing.
The court emphasized that when a victim alleges rape and states there was no consent, the presumption under Section 114A of the IPC must apply, reinforcing that such matters must be resolved in a ful....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.