Back
R. G. AVACHAT, R. M. JOSHI
Ganesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.G.AVACHAT, J. - The challenge in this appeal is mainly to the quantum of sentence imposed against the appellant for offences punishable under Ss. 307 and 309 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant was prosecuted for having slit throat of Master Ashitosh Pradeep Wabale with a knife in the afternoon of 13/5/2013 and thereafter attempted to commit suicide. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon (trial Court), vide impugned judgment and order dtd. 21/9/2018, passed in Sessions Case No.88/2013, convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Sec. 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.5000.00, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months, and further convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Sec. 309 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs.1000.00, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 2 months.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that, the victim has been recovered of his injuries within a few days of the incidence. The appellant attempted to commit suicide as a remourse for the incid
The nature of injury is immaterial, and what is relevant is the nature of the weapon used to inflict the injury. Imposing appropriate sentences to protect society and deter criminals is crucial.
The judgment reinforces that intent and premeditation in violent crimes are critical for establishing guilt under IPC sections related to murder and attempted murder.
The distinction between 'murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' under Sections 299 and 300 of IPC, and the application of the reformative theory of punishment in determining the appr....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering the nature of injuries and the manner of assault in determining the appropriate charge and sentencing for the accused....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove mens rea for the offence under Section 307 IPC and the interpretation of the nature of the injury in determining the ap....
The court has the discretion to reduce the sentence based on the period already served by the appellant.
Quantum of sentence – There can be no straitjacket formulae – A delicate balance has to be struck – Fundamental underpinning is principle of proportionality.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's discretion in sentencing, affirming that the findings were just and proper, with no grounds for interference.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
