IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Bharati Dangre, J.
Esrar Nazrul Ahemad – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1459 of 2022
Decided On : 10-06-2022
Section 67-A - Information Technology Act - The court held that the term 'sexually explicit' in Section 67-A should not be restricted to showing sexual activity but should be construed broadly to cover any activity that can be considered sexually explicit. The court also emphasized that the transmission of a nude video in electronic form falls within the purview of 'sexually explicit' and requires custodial interrogation.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant is accused of publishing a woman's nude video in electronic form, leading to its wide circulation and harassment of the woman.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the accusations against the applicant required custodial interrogation and that the transmission of the nude video in electronic form fell within the purview of 'sexually explicit' as per Section 67-A of the Information Technology Act.
Issues: Accusation of publishing a woman's nude video in electronic form, interpretation of 'sexually explicit' under Section 67-A.
Ratio Decidendi: The term 'sexually explicit' in Section 67-A should be broadly construed to cover any activity that can be considered sexually explicit, and the transmission of a nude video in electronic form falls within this purview.
Final Decision: The court held that the accusations required custodial interrogation and that the submission of the applicant's counsel that Section 67-A prima facie does not attract did not hold at this stage.
ORDER
1. The applicant is accused of the offence punishable under Section 6 7 A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, the LT.Act) and under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code in C.R.No.242 of 2022 registered with Kashimira Police Station, Mira Road, Thane, on 13/04/2022.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P.
3. The C.R. is registered at the instance of the complainant, aged 44 years, who has alleged in her complaint that she was married and having two children. She was introduced to the present applicant as he was friend of her husband. In short span of time, they developed intimacy, which made them indulge into physical act. She categorically admitted in her complaint that sexual relationship was established by her consent. While in the relationship, the applicant requested the complainant to share her nude video and though she was initially hesitant, on a promise that after watching the video, he will immediately delete it, she has forwarded it on his WhatsApp. The applicant assured her that the video was deleted.
4. Somewhere in the year May 2017, she and her husband were invited to the applicant's house where his wife and daughter confronted her with her nude video and directed her that she should not establish any relationship with the applicant. Thereafter, she severed her relationship with the present applicant, is her version.
Almost after three years, once again the applicant established contact with her and expressed his desire to restore the relationship, but when she refused, he threatened her that he is in possession of her nude video. Upon this threat, she again started meeting him. Immediately thereafter, she received the nude video on her Whatsapp and, thereafter, even her husband received the said video. The video was widely circulated in village. Being harassed in this way, she lodged the complaint resulting into registration of the crime.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant would vehemently submit that even if the accusations are taken as it is, this would not attract the provisions of Section 67-A, which prescribes the punishment for a term which may extend to seven years and also with fine which may extend to ten lakh rupees.
Section 67-A prescribes the punishment for publishing or transmitting of material containing sexually explicit act etc. in electronic form. Pertinent to note that Chapter XI of the I.T.Act, includes the offence punishable under Section 67 which provides the punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form. The relevant Section reads thus
67. Punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form Whoever publishes or transmits or causes to be published or transmitted in the electronic form, any material which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or if its effect is such as to tend to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely, having regard to all relevant circumstances, to read., see or hear the matter contained, or embodied, in it, shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years and with fine which may extend to five lakh rupees and in the event of second or subsequent conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years and also with fine which may extend to ten lakh rupees.
6. Section 67-A is a species of Section 67 which is a genus and makes an act of publishing or transmitting of material containing sexually explicit act in electronic form. Further, Section 67-B is another species of Section 67, which makes punishable an act of publishing or transmitting of material depicting children in sexually explicit act in electronic form.
7. The submission of the learned counsel that mere forwarding a nude video would not fall within the purview of 'sexually explicit might not be correct. The term 'explicit' is defined in Oxford Dictionary as under
Stated clearly and precis
AI
The term 'sexually explicit' in Section 67-A of the Information Technology Act should be broadly construed to cover any activity that can be considered sexually explicit, including the transmission o....
Important points:The alleged publication of the photograph of the 2nd respondent during the time of the inaugural function of the Jewellery is admittedly, by itself cannot be said to be in any manner....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between the penal provisions of Section 67 and Section 67-A of the IT Act, and the necessity of material containing sexually explic....
Publication must depict actual sexual acts to invoke Section 67A of the IT Act.
Pre-arrest bail granted, emphasizing no necessity for custodial interrogation and distinguishing between offenses under the IT Act.
Section 67A of the I.T. Act requires depiction of actual sexual acts for conviction; mere transmission of nude images is insufficient for this charge.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of sharing, transmitting, or publishing sexually explicit materials involving a child to establish offences under Section 15(1) of th....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of evidence showing sharing, transmission, or publishing of sexually explicit and pornographic materials involving a child to esta....
The court affirmed that posting obscene messages on a public forum can constitute an insult to modesty irrespective of the victim's membership in that forum.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.