IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR
V. M. Deshpande, Amit B. Borkar, JJ.
Mandar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. – Respondents
Criminal Application [Appeal] No. 523 of 20 22
Decided On : 13-04-2022
Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - Offence under Section 354 IPC - Settlement between parties - Court's power to quash FIR
Fact of the Case:
The applicant challenged the registration of the first information report (FIR) and consequent charge-sheet filed against him for the offence punishable under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) based on the accusation of offending the modesty of the non-applicant no.2. The parties arrived at a settlement during the pendency of the application.
Finding of the Court:
The non-applicant no.2 filed an affidavit stating that the registration of the FIR was due to a misunderstanding and that she has mutually resolved her dispute with the applicant. The Court, after reviewing the material, found that the ingredients of the offence under Section 354 IPC as alleged against the applicant were not fulfilled, even if the material in the charge-sheet was taken at face value. Citing the judgment in Narinder Singh vs. State of Punjab, the Court observed that it can quash the FIR if it is of the opinion that the offence is unnecessarily incorporated in the FIR and there is an amicable resolution between the parties.
Issues: Challenge to registration of FIR and charge-sheet, settlement between the parties, power of the Court to quash FIR
Ratio Decidendi: The Court has the power to quash a criminal case if the FIR incorporates a serious offence or an offence against society, but the ingredients of the offence are not fulfilled, and there is an amicable resolution between the parties.
Final Decision: The criminal application was allowed, and the Court quashed and set aside the FIR and charge-sheet pending before the Judicial Magistrate in connection with the offences punishable under Section 354 IPC.
JUDGMENT
amit B. Borkar, J. - Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.
2. By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant is challenging registration of the first information report dated 28.12.2021 vide Crime No. 372/2021 and consequent Charge-sheet No. 1313/2022 dated 16.03.2022 filed against him at the behest of non-applicant no.2 with non-applicant no.1 - Police Station, Bajaj Nagar, Nagpur for the offence punishable under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The first information report in question came to be registered against the applicant with accusation that the applicant did the act which amounted to offending the modesty of non-applicant no.2. The applicant has, therefore, challenged registration of the first information report by filing the present application. The investigating agency after completion of the investigation, filed charge-sheet against the applicant.
4. We have heard Shri C. D. Rohankar, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri M. K. Pathan, learned additional Public Prosecutor non-applicant no.1 and Mr. S. R. Dambhare, learned counsel for non-applicant no.2.
5. During pendency of this application, the applicant and non-applicant no.2 have mutually arrived at a settlement.
6. Non-applicant no.2, who is personally present in the Court today along with her mother, has filed an affidavit stating that registration of the first information report was due to misunderstanding with the applicant and she has mutually resolved her dispute with the applicant. Therefore, she has no objection for quashing the criminal proceedings against the applicant. The affidavit filed by non-applicant no.2 is taken on record and marked as 'Exhibit-X' for the purposes of identification. The non-applicant no.2 and her mother both have stated before the Court that the consent for quashing of the criminal proceedings against the applicant is out of free will and voluntary.
7. We have also gone through the entire material placed on record in the form of charge-sheet. after going through the allegations in the first information report and the material produced in the form of charge-sheet, we are satisfied that the ingredients of the offence under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code as alleged against the applicant are not fulfilled even if the material in the charge-sheet is taken on its face value.
8. The Hon'ble apex Court in Narinder Singh .vs. State of Punjab, reported in 2014 aIR SCW 2065 has observed that the Court cannot decline to quash criminal case in which the first information report incorporates a particular provision, which is a serious offence or an offence against the society. The Court shall make all endeavor whether the first information report indeed discloses the ingredient of such offence and Court can accept the settlement and quash the first information report, if the Court is of the opinion that such offence is unnecessarily incorporated in the first information report.
9. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble apex Court in Narinder Singh's case (supra) and in view of amicable resolution of the dispute between the applicant and non-applicant no.2, there is no impediment for quashing of the first information report and the charge-sheet against the applicant. We, therefore, pass the following order :
ORDER
1. The Criminal application is allowed.
3. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (i), which reads as under :
''quash and set aside the First Information Report vide Crime No. 372/2021 registered at Police Station, Bajaj Nagar, Nagpur on 28.12.2021 and charge-sheet which registered as R.C.C. No. 1313/2022 on 16.03.2022 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Nagpur, in connection with the offences punishable under Sections 354 of the Indian Penal Code.''
The court can quash a criminal case if it finds that the alleged offense is unnecessarily incorporated in the FIR and the ingredients of the offense are not satisfied, especially when the parties hav....
The Court can quash a criminal case if the first information report discloses a serious offence unnecessarily and if there is an amicable resolution between the parties.
The court can quash a criminal case if the FIR incorporates a serious offence and the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
The Court can quash a criminal case if the FIR incorporates a serious offence unnecessarily and if the parties have amicably resolved their dispute.
The court can quash proceedings in cases of personal nature, especially when an amicable compromise has been reached between the parties.
The court has the authority to quash proceedings if an amicable settlement is reached between the parties and if the allegations are similar to a previously quashed FIR.
The court can quash an FIR if the essential ingredients of the alleged offences are not fulfilled, and there is a settlement between the parties.
The court can quash FIR and proceedings when the allegations are personal in nature and the parties have amicably resolved their dispute.
The amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute can be a valid ground for quashing a First Information Report.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.