VIBHA KANKANWADI
Santosh Lalchand Shivnekar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Applicants are apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No.1 of 2022, registered with Sakri Police Station, Taluka Sakri District Dhule, for the offences punishable under Section 498A, 406, 313, 504, 506 read with 34 of the IPC.
2. Heard learned Advocate Mr. S. V. Suryawanshi for applicants and learned APP Mr. A. M Phule for respondent-State. In order to cut short, it is stated that both of them have made submissions in support of their respective contentions.
3. Informant is the daughter-in-law of applicants. Informant got married with the son of applicants on 25-06-2020. In the FIR she alleges that at the time of settlement of marriage, though it was stated that the boy is not serving anywhere, but promise was made that he would get a service in the near future. Because of the said representation, she gave consent, but in the same meeting applicant No.1 told the parents of the informant that they should give the amount of Rs.12 lakh as dowry, as they have requiring amount of Rs.25 lakh for getting a job for the bridegroom. Therefore, her mother had given cash of Rs.4 lakh, then she had transferred amount of Rs.30,000/- to the account of applicant No.1. Thereaft
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.