Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
M. S. JAWALKAR
Raju – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay @ Nana – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT
M.S. Jawalkar, J. - Heard.
2. The present second appeal is filed being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29/07/2004 passed by learned 14th Adhoc Additional District Judge, Nagpur in Regular Civil Appeal No.103/2002 partly allowed the appeal and the judgment and decree dated 11/02/2002 passed by 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur in Regular Civil Suit No. 1608/1996 is modified.
3. This Court admitted this appeal on 15/12/2004 on following substantial questions of law:
ii) Whether the decrees passed by both the courts below are vitiated on account of the fact that the material ev
The burden of proof in establishing the nature of property under Hindu law rests on the party asserting its joint family character. The concept of a nucleus from which properties are acquired and the....
The judgment establishes that the burden of proof rests on the party claiming property as joint family property, and without sufficient evidence of a joint family nucleus, properties acquired remain ....
The burden of proof is on the party asserting that the property is joint family property, and unless the foundational facts are established, the property will be deemed to be the self-acquired proper....
The plaintiff must prove the existence of a joint family nucleus to establish claims over joint family properties; mere relation does not imply entitlement.
Daughters became coparceners under Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1989, allowing them equal rights in joint family properties.
The presumption of joint family property does not apply if the property is proven to be self-acquired; the burden of proof lies on the claimant of joint family property.
Baikuntha Nath Paramanik (dead) by his L.Rs. and others vs. Sashi Bhusan Paramanik (dead) by his LRs. and others
-
Read summaryBhagwant P. Sulakhe vs. Digambar Gopal Sulakhe and others
-
Read summaryRohit Chauhan vs. Surinder Singh and others
-
Read summarySher Singh and others vs. Gamdoor Singh
-
Read summaryShyam Narayan Prasad vs. Krishna Prasad and others AIR 2018 SC 3152
-
Read summarySrinivas Krishnarao Kango vs. Narayan Devji Kango and others
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.