SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 900

VIBHA KANKANWADI, ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
Asif – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mohit Lalit Deoda, Advocate

JUDGMENT

VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. - Admit.

2. Present Appeal has been filed under Sec. 14A (2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act (for short "the Atrocities Act") by original accused No.4 to challenge the order of rejection of his bail under Sec. 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Criminal Bail Application No.234 of 2022 by learned Special Judge under the Atrocities Act / Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, District-Ahmednagar on 13/10/2022.

3. Present respondent No.2 is the original informant who has filed First Information Report (for short "FIR") vide Crime No. 733 of 2022 with Shrirampur City Police Station, Shrirampur, District-Ahmednagar on 30/8/2022 alleging that the present appellant - original accused No.4 and other three accused persons have committed offence punishable under Ss. 376(2)(n), (l), 376(d) of the Indian Penal Code and Ss. 3(1)(w)(i)(ii) and 3(2)(V-A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015. In the FIR, the informant has contended that she is the member of scheduled caste. However, it will not be out of place to mention here that when the charge-sheet has been filed, at that time it was found

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top