SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 953

G. A. SANAP
Ashok Kedarnath Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Kedarnath Dashrath Gupta – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.S.Kurekar, Advocate, K.Y.Mandape, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Mr. R. S. Kurekar, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. K. Y. Mandape, learned advocate for the respondent.

2. In this writ petition, challenge is to the order dtd. 7/6/2022 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court No.4, Nagpur on application (Exh.6) in Petition No. E414/2019, whereby the learned Judge was pleased to direct the petitioner to pay Rs.10, 000.00 per month to the respondent towards interim maintenance from the date of application i.e. 6/8/2019.

3. The respondent is the father of the petitioner. Perusal of the pleadings would show that this litigation is the most unfortunate litigation considering the relationship. The mother of the petitioner and the wife of the respondent has filed an affidavit and stated that she is not claiming any maintenance from the petitioner. She has also stated that her husband/respondent is not entitled to claim maintenance from the petitioner.

4. The main petition filed by the respondent for maintenance as per the provisions of Sec. 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is pending before the Family Court. During pendency of this petition, the respondent applied for interim maintenance @ Rs.20, 000.00 per month. Accordin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top