SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 954

M. S. SONAK, BHARAT P. DESHPANDE
Joaquina Gomes – Appellant
Versus
State Of Goa – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.D.Lotlikar, Advocate, T.Sequeira, Advocate, S.Kenny, Advocate, Sapna Mordekar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

M.S.SONAK,J. - Heard Mr S. D. Lotlikar, learned Senior Advocate who appears along with Mr T. Sequeira and Ms S. Kenny for the Petitioner and Ms Sapna Mordekar, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

2. Based on the pleadings in the petition and the responses filed on behalf of the respondents, it is evident that from at least the year 1998, the Petitioner was engaged in the office of the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Government of Goa, to do the work of cleaning and sweeping of the office premises and the cleaning of the toilets. Though there is no formal appointment or engagement order, there is sufficient documentary evidence through muster rolls and payment vouchers to establish such engagement.

3. In the affidavit in reply dtd. 4/5/2018 filed by Shri Deepak Bandekar, Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, in Writ Petition No.867/2017, the affiant admitted this position. The record also shows that the Petitioner was initially paid an amount of Rs.6,00.00 per month, which was revised at some later point to Rs.3,000.00 per month. Such payments were made from the contingent fund or office expenses against the receipts/vouchers. At the time of Petitioner's initia

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top