SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 988

VIBHA KANKANWADI
Anirudha Anantrao – Appellant
Versus
Pandit Instruments – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A.P.Bhandari, Advocate, A.S.Gandhi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Present appeal has been filed by the original complainant challenging the acquittal of the respondents by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad in Summary Criminal Case No.3718/2001 on 28/2/2007 from the offence punishable under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. Heard learned Advocate Mr. A.P. Bhandari for the appellant and learned Advocate Mr. A.S. Gandhi for respondent No.2.

3. The original complainant has come with a case that he is the proprietor of one M/s. Creative Industries. Accused No.1 is a private limited company and accused No.2 is the Director of accused No.1. It is also stated that she was responsible for the day to day affairs of the accused No.1- company. The complainant had business transactions with accused No.1 and in connection with the same, accused No.1 had issued cheque bearing No.297022 dtd. 23/4/2001 for Rs.3, 49, 000.00 through Managing Director Mr. Prabhakar Pandit, as part payment towards outstanding bill. The said cheque was drawn on State Bank of Hyderabad, Branch Aurangabad. It was presented by the complainant for encashment with his banker Ajanta Urban Co-operative Bank, Aurangabad, however, the cheque was dishonou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top