RAJESH S. PATIL
Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This Writ Petition is filed by Original Defendants challenging the judgment and order dtd. 18/6/2008 passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, thereby refusing to condone the delay of 31 months and 16 days, in filing the Written Statement.
2. The learned Judge of the City Civil Court, Bombay heard both the sides and on the basis of argument advanced by both the sides dismissed the delay condonation Application by order dtd. 18/6/2008. The impugned order has been challenged by the Defendants by way of the present Writ Petition.
3. 'Rule' was issued in the present Writ Petition. However, nobody has filed appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2. On the last date of hearing and today, nobody appeared for Respondent No.2. Therefore, without any assistance of Respondent No.2, the submission of Petitioners' Advocate was heard.
4. It is the case of the Defendant that suit was filed by Plaintiff (Borrower). The Plaintiff after filing of the suit preferred an Interim Application in the form of Notice of Motion No. 3909 of 2007. It is the case of the Petitioners that in the said suit Writ of Summons was served on Defendant No.1 on 23/12/2004 and Defendant No.2 on 28/12/2004. As per the
The main legal point established is that while the time schedule for filing a written statement should generally be honored, exceptional situations may warrant an extension to ensure a fair trial and....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the time limit for filing a written statement under the Civil Procedure Code should be treated as directory, and the court should balance the ....
The court emphasized the importance of complying with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the Commercial Courts Act 2015, regarding the filing of written statements and the exten....
Point of Law : provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 have to be strictly construed and if the provisions are given liberal interpretation, the object behind the enactment, of speedy disposal,....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion in granting or refusing permission to file the written statement, emphasizing the need to establish sufficient cause and ....
A written statement filed beyond the statutory period requires a timely condonation application, and failure to provide sufficient grounds renders it inadmissible.
The court affirmed that procedural rules regarding the filing of written statements can be interpreted flexibly to ensure justice, allowing extensions in exceptional circumstances.
Point of Law : Civil Law – Condonation of Delay - Extension of time for filing written statement - Court must be satisfied that the defendant was prevented from a sufficient cause for exceptional and....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that in commercial suits, the court does not have the power to condone the delay in filing the written statement beyond 120 days from the date of s....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the defendant to file the written statement within the prescribed period, the consequences of failing to do so, and the applica....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.