SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1028

KISHORE C. SANT
Amanulla – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P. R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate, Amol G. Vasmatkar, Advocate, D. S. Jape, Advocate, G. R. Syed, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kishore C. Sant, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By the consent of the parties taken up for final hearing.

2. The present petition is filed by the original accused persons challenging an order passed under Section 242 sub section (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'Cr.P.C.') by the learned C.J.M., Latur dated 02.07.2022. By way of impugned order, the learned Trial Judge has allowed the application filed by the prosecution seeking permission to produce on record the documents as per the list during the course of evidence.

3. The facts are that the informant is the owner of land Gat No. 57 admeasuring 80 R from village Borwati, Taluka and District Latur. She became owner of the land by purchasing the land in the year 1985. It is the allegation that the accused persons by forging the documents and by forging the signature of the informant created certain documents and on the basis of those documents have filed suit against her. On receiving a summons in the suit the respondent No. 2/original complainant tried to lodge FIR against the present petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 469, 471, 465, 417, 191, 209 r/w section 34 of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top