SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1073

KISHORE C. SANT
Namdeo – Appellant
Versus
Seema – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ravindra V.Gore, Advocate, Sandip R.Andhale, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, heard finally at the admission stage.

2. A challenge in this petition is to the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Beed dtd. 30/11/2016, passed in Criminal Revision No.138 of 2015, thereby dismissing the revision application. The revision was filed challenging the judgment and order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ashti dtd. 29/9/2015 in Criminal Misc. Application No.38 of 2013. By the said order, the learned JMFC had granted maintenance under Sec. 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code to respondent Nos.1 and 2 i.e. husband and daughter at the rate of Rs.2000.00 and Rs.1000.00 per month respectively.

3. Respondent No.1-wife filed an application under Sec. 125 of the Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance for herself and daughter, who was aged 5 1/2 months at the time of filing of the application. It is case of the wife that the husband did not maintain her well and driven her out of the house on 20/4/2012. There was demand of Rs.25,000.00 to buy a bullock cart. The wife was required to file complaint under Sec. 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. She delivered a daughter on 15/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top