SANDEEP V. MARNE
Vasant Bhaskar Thakur, [since deceased through legal heirs] – Appellant
Versus
Sitaram Waman Thakur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Admit. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is taken up for hearing forthwith.
2. Power of an Appellate Court to remand a suit for retrial under Order 41 Rule 23A of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 is an issue that has attracted attention of this Court in the present appeal. The issue arises in the light of Appellant’s challenge to the judgment and order dated 22 March 2022 passed by the District Judge, Raigad by which the judgment and decree dated 22 April 2017 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Alibaug in Regular Civil Suit No.147/2011 is set aside and the suit is remanded for fresh hearing after adding necessary parties and after framing additional issues.
3. For better understanding of the controversy involved, narration of few basic facts of the case would be necessary. Appellant-Plaintiff has pleaded in his plaint that various properties were jointly owned and possessed by Waman Nathu Thakur and Bhaskar Rama Thakur. There was an oral partition on 1 June 1950 between the duo in accordance with which, Mutation Entry No. 1187 was effected. Land bearing Survey No.100 at Village-Saral, Taluka-Alibaug, District-Raigad was sub
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.