VIBHA KANKANWADI, ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
Hanuman S/o Dattarao Karkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.
1. Getting dissatisfied by the judgment and order of conviction passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gangakhed in Sessions Trial No. 7 of 2012 dated 12.05.2016, for the offence punishable under Sections 144, 148, 302 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code [IPC], all five appellants have preferred the instant appeal praying to quash and set aside the said judgment.
2. On the request of original accused no.5, a separate Advocate i.e. Advocate Mrs. Sharda P. Chate has been appointed to represent his cause by filing separate appeal. Since both appeals are arising out of the one and the same judgment and order of conviction, both are decided by this common judgment.
FACTS LEADING TO TRIAL
3. Informant PW1 Devidas had a dispute with accused nos. 1, 4 and 5 over the field taken by him for cultivation. Deceased Sudhakar, who was brother of informant, was helping him in cultivating the field. There used to be quarrel between deceased and accused on that count. On the morning of 19.08.2011 at 9.00 a.m., there was quarrel between deceased Sudhakar and accused nos.1 to 5. Informant intervened and brought his brother Sudhakar to the house. Thereafter, informant wen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.