Leyla Mohmoodi, through Constituted Attorney Sandip D. Kadam vs Additional Commissioner of Customs

Breaking News

Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea

07 Mar 2026

Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s

07 Mar 2026

Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice

07 Mar 2026

Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder

07 Mar 2026

Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC

07 Mar 2026

Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS

07 Mar 2026

Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court

07 Mar 2026

S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court

09 Mar 2026

Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse

Back Next

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1623

G. S. KULKARNI, JITENDRA JAIN
Leyla Mohmoodi, through Constituted Attorney Sandip D. Kadam – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner of Customs – Respondent

Listen Article

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Balani a/w Mr. Jas Sanghavi, Mr. Prakash Shringrani, Ms. Priyasha Pawar, Mr. Alekshendra Sharma, Ms. Revati Nansi, i/b PDS Legal
For the Respondent: Mr. Devang Vyas, ASG a/w Ms. Neeta Masurkar and Mr. Ram Ochani, Ms. Nithee Punde a/w Mr. Harshad Shingnapurkar

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT :

G. S. Kulkarni, J.

The judgment has been divided into the following parts:

S.No.	Contents
Read more document

Related Judgments

Leyla Mohmoodi, through Constituted Attorney Sandip D. Kadam VS Additional Commissioner of Customs - 2023 Supreme(Bom) 1623

The disposal of seized property without notice and due process violates constitutional rights, rendering such actions illegal and unconstitutional.

Valimahomed Gulamhussain Sonavala and Co. v. C.T.A. Pillai Addl. Collector of Customs - 1961 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 2

Quasi-judicial proceedings require strict adherence to principles of natural justice, including the right to cross-examine witnesses, which was violated in this case, rendering the confiscation order....

Shri Jacky Kumar Jain vs GUNTUR- Appeal - 2026 Supreme(Online)(CESTAT) 130

Ganesh Sawant VS Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) - 2023 Supreme(Del) 4655

The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of notice and participation in the proceedings under Section 110(1D) of the Customs Act, based on the principles of natural justice....

Union of India VS Sushanta Karmakar @ Susanta Karmakar - 2023 Supreme(Cal) 335

Commissioner of Customs VS Rajesh Jhamatmal Bhat - 2023 Supreme(All) 2249

Bhagwati Jewellers VS Directorate Of Enforcement - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 1322

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the gold bullion seized during the search was stock-in-trade and duly accounted in the books of accounts, as per the relevant provisions of FE....

Luvleen Maingi VS Union of India - 2024 Supreme(Del) 937

The court ruled that gold jewellery worn by a foreign national upon entering India is considered personal effects and cannot be confiscated without clear legal prohibition.

Muthoot Finance Limited vs State of Karnataka - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 34734

The court upheld that seizure actions by police must comply with Articles 14 and 19, reaffirming the necessity for following established legal guidelines when handling seized property.

Additional Director General (Adjudication) VS It. S My Name Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 Supreme(Del) 4169

The central legal point established in the judgment is that the findings of fact cannot be revisited unless they suffer from manifest perversity, and the court's decision was based on the positive fi....