IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
Sagar Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Through its Member, Vishwambhar Shriram Tanpure – Petitioner
Versus
Government of India, Through its Ministry of Social Justice Empowerment, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment and Ors. – Respondents
WRIT PETITION NO. 3797 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 5088 OF 2022 WITH CA/361/2023 IN WP/5088/2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 3805 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 4635 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 4805 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 4806 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 4856 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 4857 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 5046 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 5093 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 5097 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 6429 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 6466 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 9143 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 11582 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 4832 OF 2022 WITH CA/363/2023 IN WP/4832/2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 9997 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 10002 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 12070 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 12071 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7476 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7477 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7478 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7479 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7480 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7481 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7482 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7483 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7484 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7485 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7486 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7487 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7488 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7723 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7741 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7744 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7746 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7747 OF 2022, ND WRIT PETITION NO. 7878 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 8413 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 8431 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 10400 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 12277 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 12813 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 12862 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 7475 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.4144 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.10962 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.10968 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.11073 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.11092 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.11792 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.11802 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.11812 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.11813 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.11817 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.11819 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.485 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.3799 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.3801 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.3802 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.4400 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.4839 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.5084 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.5094 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.5095 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.5406 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.6258 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.6259 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.7317 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.8415 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.8426 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.8445 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.8500 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.12737 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 6253 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 3803 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 3804 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 4055 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.5377 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.5430 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.5444 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.5445 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.5467 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.5737 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.6409 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.6477 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.6478 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.6479 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.7205 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.7877 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.10525 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.10526 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.10527 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.10632 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.10838 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO.12672 OF 2022.
Decided On : 05-12-2023
Scholarship Disbursement - Challenge to Guidelines - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Clauses 11.1 and 11.2 - Direct Beneficiary Transfer (DBT) - Aadhaar Based Payment System (ABPS) - Public Financial Management System (PFMS) - Union and State Government shares - Disbursement mechanism - Policy matter - Protection of public money - Reimbursement of educational institutions - Fundamental rights of petitioner-institutions - Timely disbursement - Irregularities and loopholes - Shift in policy - Dismissal of petitions
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners challenge clause nos. 11.1 and 11.2 of the Guidelines issued by the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India, regarding the disbursement of Post Matric Scholarships to Scheduled Caste students. The petitioners argue that the clauses mandating direct disbursement of scholarship amounts to students' accounts only, without reimbursing the institutions directly, would prejudice their interests.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the dispute primarily concerns the implementation of a centrally sponsored scheme through the State Government, rather than affecting any fundamental right. The court noted that the clauses seek to provide a mechanism for disbursement of scholarship and prevent irregularities in the use of public money. The court dismissed the petitions, stating that the clauses were not arbitrary or unreasonable and did not obstruct the rights of petitioner-institutions.
Issues: Challenge to clauses 11.1 and 11.2 of the Guidelines - Impact on petitioner-institutions' right to seek reimbursement - Timely disbursement of scholarships - Protection of public money
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the clauses, aimed at preventing irregularities and ensuring the smooth disbursement of scholarships, did not violate the fundamental rights of petitioner-institutions. The court emphasized the need to protect public money and noted that the petitioners' apprehensions were based on hypothetical scenarios and exceptional cases.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitions, stating that the clauses were not arbitrary or unreasonable and did not obstruct the rights of petitioner-institutions. The respondent No.1 Union was directed to deposit fresh demand drafts for the petitioners to withdraw.
JUDGMENT :
(Mangesh S. Patil, J.) :
Heard. Rule in all the petitions. It is made returnable forthwith. At the joint request of the parties all these matters raising similar issues are being disposed of by this common judgment. Writ Petition No. 3797/2023 and Writ Petition No. 5088/2023 are taken as lead petitions with the consent of all the petitioners and the respondents from the rest of the petitions.
2. By invoking the powers of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the association of managements of unaided engineering colleges and individual managements are putting up a challenge to clause nos. 11.1 and 11.2 of the guidelines issued by the respondent no. 1- Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India, laying down guidelines in respect of the Post Matric Scholarships to the Students Belonging to Scheduled Castes for Studies in India (2020-21 to 2025-26) issued in the month of March 2021 (hereinafter ‘Guidelines’). In some of these petitions there is a challenge to even the subsequent government resolution issued by the Social Justice and Special Assistance Department of the Government of Maharashtra (respondent no. 2 in WP no. 3797/2022) dated 17.03.2022 adopting the Guidelines.
3. Before adverting to the rival submissions it would be apt to understand the scenario leading to the dispute :
With the avowed object of ameliorating the conditions of the Scheduled Caste students who are unable to pursue higher education for want of means, a scheme has been in place at least since 1959-60. It is in the nature of financial assistance for taking higher education in specified fields. The private institutions operating in the field like the petitioners are mandated to admit the students belonging to Scheduled Castes, without charging any fees and are being reimbursed the tuition fees, hostel fees etc. by the Union and the State Governments. Till the Guidelines were issued in March 2021, the institutions were being reimbursed by directly crediting money in their accounts. The impugned clauses 11.1 and 11.2 which seek to change this mechanism are the bone in the flesh. These clauses mandate that any disbursement of the entire scholarship amount including the tuition fees, academic allowance and any other admissible allowance to be paid directly into the account of the students only, through Direct Beneficiary Transfer (DBT), preferably through an Aadhaar Based Payment System (ABPS) (Aadhaar Payment Bridge) from the year 2021-22. Even the State Governments have been mandated to release the payments through Public Financial Management System (PFMS) so that the accounts of the students need not be required to be validated again. The State Governments are also directed to release their share of 40% directly into the bank account of the students. The clauses 11.1 and 11.2 read as under :
11.2 Starting from 2021-22, the Central share in the scheme would also be released on DBT mode directly into the bank accounts of the students, after ensuring that the concerned State Government has released their share.”
Though the State Government adopted these Guidelines by a resolution dated 17.03.2022, it was expressly laid down therein that the 40% share of the State Government would be released through DBT Portal in the students bank account and the institutes bank account separately, through PFMS directly. It appears that with a little modification anot
TMA Pai Vs. State of Karnataka; (2002) 8 SCC 481
P. A. Inamdar and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others; (2005) 6 SCC 537
Islamic Academy of Education and another Vs. State of Karnataka and others
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of hearing necessary parties in a dispute and affording them a reasonable opportunity to defend themselves.
The discretion of the State Governments and Union Territory Administrations in implementing the Central Government Scheme for Post Matric Scholarship is paramount, and the Court cannot interfere with....
The court established that the government has the authority to formulate scholarship policies and eligibility criteria, provided they are not arbitrary or in violation of statutory provisions, and th....
The court affirmed that strict adherence to the scholarship scheme's conditions is paramount, limiting the court's ability to alter established payment processes.
The court affirmed that the terms of the scholarship scheme cannot be altered, ensuring compliance with the guidelines established by the Government.
Government of Kerala will remit the applicable Scholarship amount to students whose Annual Family Income is Rs.2,50,000/- or less into their designated accounts; but will ensure, through a properly c....
The right to grant-in-aid is not absolute and depends on state financial policy, thereby, limitations on salary grants imposed by the State are lawful.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.