IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Riddhi Gardens Building – Appellant
Versus
District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai and Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Lodg.) No. 14346 of 2023, Interim Application (Lodg.) No. 1560 of 2024 Decided on : 08-03-2024
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, petition is taken for final hearing and disposal.
A. ISSUES
2. Petition raises two broad issues:
(ii) Given the settled position that validity of such interest or right in respect of conveyed land can only be agitated in a civil suit, while relegating parties to exercise their remedies before a Civil Court, whether incorporation of such interest or right in the certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance should be retained or removed?
B. THE CHALLENGE
3. The issue arise in the light of challenge set up by Petitioner-Society to the certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance issued by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai City-4 and Competent Authority (Competent Authority) issued under the provisions of Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 (MOFA). By the impugned Order and Certificate, the Society is actually granted unilateral deemed conveyance of the land and building as desired by the Society. However, the grievance of the Society is about incorporation of a caveat by the Competent Authority in the certificate whereby conveyance of the land is made subject to the right of access to the buildings on neighbouring plots, not forming part of the layout in which Society’s building is situated. The issue that arises for consideration is whether the Competent Authority, while issuing certificate of deemed conveyance under Section 11 of the MOFA, can take into consideration any document foreign to agreements executed with Flat purchasers under Section 4 of the MOFA and make the conveyance subject to the right created under such document.
C. FACTS
4. M/s. Asian Constructions (Respondent No.13) undertook development in respect of Plots bearing CTS No.677/B/1, 677/B/3, 677/B/4 and 653/A/1B/1 at Village-Malad (East), Mumbai Suburban District situated at General Arun Kumar Vaidya Marg, Malad (East), Mumbai and it got a layout sanctioned for the aforestated plots (the said layout). In pursuance of development permissions issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), has constructed multiple buildings on the layout. The Developer entered into agreements for sale of flats constructed in such buildings as per Section 4 of the MOFA. The Agreements reserved right of the Developer to revise/amend the layout plans as well as building plans and to consume additional FSI. It appears that six cooperative societies have been formed by the flat purchasers in the buildings so constructed on the said layout as under :
ii. Riddhi Gardens Building M1-M2-M3 Co-operative Housing Society Limited situated on plot of land bearing CTS No. 653A/1B/1.
iii. Riddhi Tower Co-operative Housing Society Limited situated on a plot of land bearing CTS No. 677B/3.
iv. Rushi Heights situated on part of plot of land bearing CTS No. 677-B/1.
v. Riddhi Garden H1 H2 Co-operative Housing Society Limited also situated on part of Land bearing CTS No. 677-B/1.
vi. Riddhi Garden H3 H4 Co-operative Housing Society situated on a part of plot of land bearing CTS No. 677-B/1.
5. The said layout, on which buildings of the above six societies are situated, is common and there are several common facilities such as Recreational Ground, open spaces, internal roads etc for use and enjoyment by members of all six Societies. A 12 meter wide internal road connecting all buildings of the six societies with Goregaon-Mulund Link Road has been sanctioned i
Tushar Jivram Chauhan and another V/s. State of Maharashtra and others
AI
The Competent Authority under MOFA cannot include rights not recognized in agreements executed under Section 4 in a unilateral deemed conveyance certificate.
The statutory obligation under Section 11 of MOFA requires the promoter to convey both land and building to the society, and the Competent Authority must enforce this obligation upon the promoter's f....
The competent authority's jurisdiction to grant deemed conveyance is limited and cannot delve into aspects of title. An order granting deemed conveyance does not conclude the issue of right, title, a....
The court affirmed that deemed conveyance under MOFA can apply to composite societies, despite differing member agreements, emphasizing equitable treatment and the necessity of proper procedural comp....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of the Competent Authority's enquiry under section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963, and the dismissal of the P....
The Competent Authority's failure to ensure service of notice and adherence to natural justice principles invalidates the ex parte decision regarding Unilateral Deemed Conveyance.
The Competent Authority under MOFA cannot adjudicate title disputes; it must fulfill statutory obligations to issue deemed conveyance to the Society.
The Competent Authority must comply with statutory obligations and government guidelines when issuing deemed conveyance certificates, ensuring proper measurement and entitlement assessment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.