SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 353

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Riddhi Gardens Building – Appellant
Versus
District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai and Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Lodg.) No. 14346 of 2023, Interim Application (Lodg.) No. 1560 of 2024 Decided on : 08-03-2024

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar with Mr. Rahul Kedar & Mr. Tanuj Lodha i/b Lodha & Lodha Advocates
For the Respondent: Mr. Vishal Kanade with Mr. Rakesh V. Misar, Ms. Aastha Pande & Ms. Rupali Jadhav, Mr. Amrut Joshi with Ms. Stenna Fernandes i/b Mr. Ashish T. Suryawanshi, Mr. Mohit Jadhav, Additional Government Pleader with Ms. Gaurangi Patil

The Competent Authority under MOFA cannot include rights not recognized in agreements executed under Section 4 in a unilateral deemed conveyance certificate.

Headnote:(A) Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 - Section 11 - Unilateral deemed conveyance - Competent Authority's jurisdiction limited to agreements executed under Section 4 - Right of way granted post-agreement not cognizable - Condition of right of way in deemed conveyance certificate set aside. (Paras 30, 56)

(B) Jurisdiction of Competent Authority - Cannot adjudicate complex title issues or rights not recognized in agreements - Must convey strictly as per agreements under Section 4. (Paras 39, 44)

(C) Civil Suit - Validity of Deed of Right of Way to be adjudicated in civil court, not by Competent Authority. (Paras 56, 58)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner-Society challenged the Competent Authority's certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance, which included a condition of right of way to adjoining properties, arguing it was unauthorized and contrary to agreements executed under Section 4 of MOFA.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the Competent Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by incorporating the right of way condition, which was not part of the original agreements.

Issues: The main issues were whether the Competent Authority could consider rights not included in the agreements and the validity of the right of way granted post-agreement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Competent Authority's role is limited to enforcing agreements under Section 4, and any rights created after the agreements cannot be included in the deemed conveyance.

Result: The petition was allowed, and the condition of right of way was removed from the certificate of deemed conveyance.

JUDGMENT :

1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, petition is taken for final hearing and disposal.

A. ISSUES

2. Petition raises two broad issues:

    (i) Whether the Competent Authority, while exercising power of issuing a certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA, can take cognisance of an interest or a right in the conveyed land, which is created by a document other than the Agreement executed under Section 4?

    (ii) Given the settled position that validity of such interest or right in respect of conveyed land can only be agitated in a civil suit, while relegating parties to exercise their remedies before a Civil Court, whether incorporation of such interest or right in the certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance should be retained or removed?

B. THE CHALLENGE

3. The issue arise in the light of challenge set up by Petitioner-Society to the certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance issued by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai City-4 and Competent Authority (Competent Authority) issued under the provisions of Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 (MOFA). By the impugned Order and Certificate, the Society is actually granted unilateral deemed conveyance of the land and building as desired by the Society. However, the grievance of the Society is about incorporation of a caveat by the Competent Authority in the certificate whereby conveyance of the land is made subject to the right of access to the buildings on neighbouring plots, not forming part of the layout in which Society’s building is situated. The issue that arises for consideration is whether the Competent Authority, while issuing certificate of deemed conveyance under Section 11 of the MOFA, can take into consideration any document foreign to agreements executed with Flat purchasers under Section 4 of the MOFA and make the conveyance subject to the right created under such document.

C. FACTS

4. M/s. Asian Constructions (Respondent No.13) undertook development in respect of Plots bearing CTS No.677/B/1, 677/B/3, 677/B/4 and 653/A/1B/1 at Village-Malad (East), Mumbai Suburban District situated at General Arun Kumar Vaidya Marg, Malad (East), Mumbai and it got a layout sanctioned for the aforestated plots (the said layout). In pursuance of development permissions issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), has constructed multiple buildings on the layout. The Developer entered into agreements for sale of flats constructed in such buildings as per Section 4 of the MOFA. The Agreements reserved right of the Developer to revise/amend the layout plans as well as building plans and to consume additional FSI. It appears that six cooperative societies have been formed by the flat purchasers in the buildings so constructed on the said layout as under :

    i. Riddhi Gardens Building No. A1, A2 Co-operative Housing Society Limited on plot of land bearing CTS No. 677-B/4.

    ii. Riddhi Gardens Building M1-M2-M3 Co-operative Housing Society Limited situated on plot of land bearing CTS No. 653A/1B/1.

    iii. Riddhi Tower Co-operative Housing Society Limited situated on a plot of land bearing CTS No. 677B/3.

    iv. Rushi Heights situated on part of plot of land bearing CTS No. 677-B/1.

    v. Riddhi Garden H1 H2 Co-operative Housing Society Limited also situated on part of Land bearing CTS No. 677-B/1.

    vi. Riddhi Garden H3 H4 Co-operative Housing Society situated on a part of plot of land bearing CTS No. 677-B/1.

5. The said layout, on which buildings of the above six societies are situated, is common and there are several common facilities such as Recreational Ground, open spaces, internal roads etc for use and enjoyment by members of all six Societies. A 12 meter wide internal road connecting all buildings of the six societies with Goregaon-Mulund Link Road has been sanctioned i

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          Judicial Analysis

          AI

          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top