IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Bharati Dangre, J.
Pittie Antariksh Grl Pvt Ltd. - Plaintiff
Versus
Kher Nagar Sai Prasad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. - Respondent
Interim Application (L) No. 27970 of 2023 In Commercial Suit Stamp No. 27651 of 2023
Decided On : 01-02-2024
Contract - Real Estate - Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act - Section 79A, Indian Contract Act, 1872 - The court considered the exchange of communications between the parties and concluded that a contract for redevelopment was concluded on material terms, despite the absence of a formal Development Agreement. The court held that the execution of the Development Agreement was not an idle formality, but the essential requirement for the project to proceed. However, in this case, the court found that a definite offer had been made and accepted without qualification, leading to the conclusion of a contract. The court granted an interim injunction against the defendant from appointing another developer or creating third-party rights in respect of the property.
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiff, a private company engaged in real estate, construction, and development, filed a suit seeking a declaration of a valid, binding, and subsisting contract with the defendant for redevelopment. The plaintiff also sought specific performance of the contract recorded in the letters dated 30/8/2021 and 23/10/2021. The defendant terminated the arrangement between the parties, prompting the plaintiff to file the suit.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that a contract for redevelopment was concluded on material terms, despite the absence of a formal Development Agreement. The court granted an interim injunction against the defendant from appointing another developer or creating third-party rights in respect of the property.
Issues: The main issue was whether a formal Development Agreement was necessary to presume a concluded contract for redevelopment.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the execution of the Development Agreement was not an idle formality, but the essential requirement for the project to proceed. However, in this case, the court found that a definite offer had been made and accepted without qualification, leading to the conclusion of a contract.
Final Decision: The court granted an interim injunction against the defendant from appointing another developer or creating third-party rights in respect of the property.
JUDGMENT :
1. The plaintiff – Pittie Antariksh Grl Pvt. Ltd (for short ‘Antariksh’), a Private Company engaged in the business of Real Estate, Construction and Development has filed a Suit, seeking a declaration for a valid, binding and subsisting contract with the defendant in terms of the letters dated 30/8/2021 and 23/10/2021, and for a decree of its performance and to do all acts, including execution of the development agreement as necessary for effectively performing the contract as recorded in the above mentioned letters. A declaration is also sought that the letter dated 24/5/2023 issued by the defendants, terminating the arrangement between the parties, is illegal, contrary to law and non-est.
2. A permanent and mandatory injunction is sought against the Defendant, Kher Nagar Sai Prasad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (Referred to as “Society”) from entering into an agreement, appointing another developer for redevelopment of the defendant’s building and/or creating third party rights in respect of the suit property.
Interim Application (L) No. 27970/2023 is filed in the Suit claiming the following reliefs pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit:
(b). This Hon’ble Court be pleased to stay effect and implementation of the defendant’s letter dated 24th May 2023 and restrain the defendant and its members from acting in furtherance of the said letter dated 24th May 2023.
(c). For interim and ad-interim reliefs in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b)”
3. Heard Mr.Sharan Jagtiani, Sr. Advocate along with Mr.Karl Tamboly for the plaintiff/applicant and Advocate Aseem Naphade i/b Aditya Shirke for the defendant.
In order to consider the Interim Application, it is necessary to refer to the background facts in the wake of which the reliefs are sought.
4. The defendant no.1 is a Co-operative Housing Society Limited registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act and is a lessee of the property admeasuring 1066.94 sq.m situated at Survey no.341 (PT) and City Survey No.04 (Part) at Kher Nagar, Bandra (East), in Mumbai City. A ground plus two floor building is standing on the suit land which has accommodated 54 tenants.
Since the Society was desirous of redeveloping its property, in the Special General Meeting held on 31/7/2021, the plaintiff was provisionally selected as a developer and on 4/8/2021, an offer letter was issued in its favour.
5. On 7/8/2021, Antariksh was informed that the final selection and its appointment as Developer for the redevelopment project will be done after following the procedure in the Special General Body Meeting, which shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions under Section 79A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. However, the letter is issued on the basis of the final offer letter dated 4/8/2021.
The letter categorically stipulated as under :-
The final selection and your appointment as the Developers for our Redevelopment project will be done after following procedure and in the Special General Body Meeting which will be conducted by the Authorised Officer appointed by Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Society, H/East Ward, Mumbai as per the procedure laid down under section 79A of Maharashtra Co-operative Society Act, 1960 with respect to redevelopment of buildings of co-operative housing societies.
Please
Heritage Lifestyle and Developers Ltd. Vs. Cool Breeze Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the execution of a formal Development Agreement is not always necessary to conclude a contract, especially when a definite offer has been made....
A formal development agreement is essential for a binding contract; ongoing negotiations do not constitute a concluded contract.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the formal Development Agreement (DA) is an essential condition of the contract, and without it, there is no concluded contract and no enforce....
The execution of a Development Agreement is essential for binding contractual rights, and compliance with timelines specified in earlier agreements is necessary for specific performance claims under ....
In redevelopment disputes under Arbitration Act Section 9, society members' right to safe housing from dilapidated buildings prevails over developer's profit rights where developer caused 13-year del....
A binding contract requires clear agreement on essential terms; mere negotiations or approvals do not suffice if key elements remain undefined.
A binding contract requires clearly agreed terms; deviations from an Expression of Interest nullify claims for specific performance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.