SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1883

VIBHA KANKANWADI, ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
Raju Rangnath Kolte – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Abhaysinh K. Bhosale, Advocate, A.M. Phule, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

ABHAY S.WAGHWASE, J. - The instant appeal under Sec. 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure [Cr.P.C.], is directed by the appellant/convict against the judgment and order dtd. 27/5/2016 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur in Sessions Case No. 81 of 2014 by which appellant came to be held guilty and so convicted and sentenced for commission the offence punishable under Sec. 302 of the Indian Penal Code [IPC]. FACTS IN BRIEF GIVING RISE TO THE SESSIONS TRIAL

2. Deceased Manisha was married to accused Raju around 9 years prior to the incident. Accused was a driver by occupation. According to prosecution, after a year or two, accused started ill-treating deceased Manisha and beat her after getting drunk. Because of such treatment meted out to her, her father PW1 Tarachand brought both of them to reside at Waluj and thereafter, at his own village i.e. Dhamori and they were put up in a rented premises owned by PW7-Kavita.

3. On 14/4/2014, Manisha suffered burns and was resultantly shifted to hospital. There she gave dying declaration Exhibit 43 recorded by PW10 PSI Vyankatesh Ranvirkar, on the strength of which crime came to be registered. While undergoing tr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top