SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 2673

SUNIL B. SHUKRE, G. A. SANAP
Urban Township Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Nagpur Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Anand Jaiswal, Advocate, Bharat B. Mehadia, Advocate, G.A. Kunte, Advocate, K.L. Dharmadhikari, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

SUNIL B.SHUKRE, J. - Rule. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner, a Company duly incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, has filed this petition seeking declaration that the reservation in the Development Plan for City of Nagpur for Primary School, bearing Reservation Nos.MN 92 and N 139, admeasuring about 4907 sq.mtrs. and 11037 sq.mtrs. respectively, out of Survey Nos.2-3/1 and 2-3/4 of Mouza Chikhli (Deosthan), Tahsil and District Nagpur, has lapsed under Sec. 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (for short "MRTP Act") and the petitioner- Company is free to develop the land belonging to it in accordance with law. It has also prayed for issuance of Notification under Sec. 127(2) of the MRTP Act for lapsing of the reservation under Sec. 127 of the MRTP Act.

3. The factual canvass of the petition, presented in it's minimalist form, is as under :

    (a) The petitioner claims to be the owner of two parcels of land, admeasuring 4907 sq.mtrs. and 11037 sq.mtrs., out of Survey Nos.2-3/1 and 2-3/4 of Mouza Chikhli, District Nagpur, which have been subjected to reservation for Primary School

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top