SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1708

G. A. SANAP
Sadhana – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
N.B. Rathod, Advocate, A.R. Chutke, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is heard finally by consent of the learned advocates for the parties.

2. In this criminal writ petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner, who is the wife of arrested accused Ajinkya Subhash Rathod, has questioned the correctness of the orders dtd. 1/12/2022 and 5/12/2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagpur Court No.1 granting police custody remand to the husband of the petitioner and also for quashing and setting aside these two orders as well as the order dtd. 8/12/2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagpur remanding the husband of the petitioner to the magisterial custody. The petitioner has also prayed for grant of bail. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing the order dtd. 5/12/2022, rejecting the application made by the petitioner under Sec. 97 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "Cr.PC).

3. The necessary and relevant facts for the decision of this petition need to be stated in brief.

The petitioner is the wife of arrested accused Ajinkya Subhash Ra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top