SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1853

ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Balkrishna – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P.G.Godhamgaonkar, Advocate, S.V.Kulkarni, Advocate, M.A.Kulkarni, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. The Petitioner is challenging deduction of the TDS on interest component of compensation awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act.

2. Heard Mrs. M. A. Kulkarni, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. P. G. Godhamgaonkar holding for Mr. S. V. Kulkarni, learned counsel for Respondent No.4 / Insurance Company.

3. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of parties heard finally.

4. The brief facts can be summarized as under:-

<WXY>The Petitioner was serving in the Police Station as a Police Constable. He met with an accident at the age of 35 and sustained 100% disability. His claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar was allowed and on an Appeal filed by the Petitioner, the same was enhanced. The High Court has enhanced compensation to Rs.22,51,375.00 from 6,31,500/- hence total enhanced payable amount is Rs.16,19,875.00 with interest @9% from 01/08/2000 to 18/07/2018. Following chart produced by the Insurance Company indicated the payment made to the Petitioner:-</WXY>

5. Mrs. M. A. Kulkarni, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the TDS deducted on the interest component of the claim amount is unlawful.

6. Mr. P. G. Godhamgaonkar hol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top