SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1820

U. J. PHALKE
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Suryabhan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.B.Joshi, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. The present appeal is preferred under Sec. 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, "the said Act") by the New India Assurance Company Limited against judgment and award dtd. 25/7/2011 passed by learned Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Chandrapur (learned Member of the Tribunal) in MACP No.99/2004. The parties are hereinafter referred as per their original nomenclature.

2. Brief facts of the case are as follows: Applicant No.1 Suryabhan is son and applicant No.2 Saraswati is widow of deceased Janu Chouke. On 29/3/2004, the deceased went along with Balkrushna Ramaji Shende, Vishwanath Chintaman Wanjari, Dnyaneshwar Ramteke, and Santosh Khobrage for purchasing and selling transaction of bullocks. The deceased was working as broker of bullocks and the above said persons were also involved in purchasing and selling of bullocks. The above said persons were to recover credit amount from one Ganesh Sahare who had purchased bullocks from them and, therefore, the deceased along with the above named persons travelled in a Tempo Trax from Botekasa Fata. The said Tempo Trax bearing No.CG-04-ZD-2268 was driven in a rash and negligent manner. As the said vehicle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top