SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1779

VINAY JOSHI, VALMIKI SA MENEZES
Vaibhavkumar Ganeshrao Patil – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
H.R.Gadhia, Advocate, S.M.Ghodeswar, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. By this petition, the Petitioner is seeking directions to the Police to add the offence under Sec. 3 read with Sec. 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 (for short, "MPID Act") in Crime No.369 of 2023 registered with Malkapur Police Station, District Buldhana.

2. It is Petitioner's contention that he along with other family members have deposited the amount with Unnati Mahila Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha, Malkapur and the same falls within the "term deposits", as defined under Sec. 2(c) of the MPID Act. It is further the Petitioner's contention that though there was assurance by the said Patsanstha i.e. Financial Establishment for return of money, but it was not. On said premise, at the instance of Petitioner, aforesaid crime has been registered, but the provisions of MPID Act have not been invoked. The Petitioner has pointed out that he along with some others have already applied to the Investigating Officer for invoking those provisions, but no steps were taken. The Petitioner has made a prima facie case about applicability of MPID Act.

3. We are aware that the Petitioner can agitate his grievance at the ti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top