M. S. SONAK, B. P. DESHPANDE
Akshay Rangayya – Appellant
Versus
State of Goa – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
BHARAT P.DESHPANDE, J. - Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the matter is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. Heard learned Counsel Shri Rohan Desai for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Goa Shri Pravin Faldessai.
3. The petitioner is praying for substantive reliefs vide prayer clauses (a) and (b) which reads thus:
(b) Treating the Second chargesheet as a supplementary chargesheet of the first FIR. Bearing FIR No.42/2023 by Panaji Police station dtd. 04/03/2023.
4. The petitioner is accused No.2 in Panaji Police Station Crime No.42 of 2023, registered on 04/03/2023. The petitioner is also accused no.1 in another Panaji Police Station Crime No.43 of 2023 registered on 04/03/2023 itself.
5. After com
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.