IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Vinay Joshi, Valmiki Sa Menezes, JJ.
Manohar - Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Application (Apl) No. 76/2021
Decided On : 28-07-2023
ABETMENT - SUICIDE - Indian Penal Code Sections 306, 34; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Section 3(2)(va) - The court analyzed the provisions of Section 306 of the IPC, which defines abetment of suicide, and Section 107, which outlines the criteria for instigation. The court emphasized that mere allegations of harassment are insufficient to establish abetment; there must be a direct link between the accused's actions and the deceased's decision to commit suicide. The court found that the evidence did not demonstrate the necessary mens rea or instigation required for abetment, leading to the quashing of the FIR and charge-sheet.
Fact of the Case:
Police personnel Ramanbabu Walde committed suicide, leaving behind notes blaming his colleagues for harassment. His father-in-law filed a police report alleging that the applicants abetted the suicide, leading to the registration of a crime under IPC Sections 306, 506, and the SC/ST Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the material on record, including the suicide notes, did not establish that the applicants had instigated the deceased to commit suicide. The notes primarily reflected the deceased's perspective of harassment without demonstrating the requisite mens rea or direct incitement by the applicants.
Issues: Whether the applicants abetted the suicide of the deceased under IPC Section 306 and whether the allegations of harassment were sufficient to sustain the charges.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that for abetment of suicide, there must be clear evidence of instigation or incitement by the accused. Mere allegations of harassment are not enough; there must be a direct causal link between the accused's actions and the deceased's decision to commit suicide.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR and charge-sheet against the applicants, concluding that the evidence did not support the allegations of abetment of suicide.
JUDGMENT/ORDER
VINAY JOSHI, J. - Police personnel namely Ramanbabu Walde attached to the District Traffic Branch, Bhandara, committed suicide on 5/4/2017 by consuming poison. Three suicide notes were recovered from the dead body blaming applicants to be responsible for his suicidal death. Father-in-law of deceased namely Dhanraj has lodged police report alleging that the applicants have abetted deceased to commit suicide which led to the registration of crime vide Crime No. 211/2017 for the offence punishable under Ss. 306, 506 read with Sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and Sec. 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act ('SC and ST Act').
2. Applicant Nos. 1 to 3 are the Police Constables whilst applicant No. 4 is a Police Inspector attached to the same office namely District Traffic Branch, Bhandara. Applicants have applied to this Court in terms of Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash First Information Report ('FIR') and charge-sheet on the premise that the material collected during the course of investigation does not make out the case of abetment.
3. It is applicants' case that the allegations about physical and mental harassment on their part are false and fabricated. Inspector General of Police Nagpur Range has conducted annual inspection of Traffic Branch, Bhandara in which certain lapses have been found. Particularly the lapses were on the part of the deceased Head Constable Walde. It is submitted that deceased got disturbed and frustrated due to inspection report, therefore under frustration he committed suicide. It is argued that the applicants were performing their official duty and the acts made therein cannot be termed as an abetment to commit suicide.
4. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that the material available on record does not disclose the ingredients to constitute an offence punishable under Sec. 306 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution has failed to adduce the material from which the act of abetment as defined under Sec. 107 of the Indian Penal Code could be construed. Per se, it cannot be said that the applicants had instigated the deceased to commit suicide with requisite mens rea and therefore First Information Report as well as charge-sheet is liable to be quashed.
5. Per contra, learned APP and learned counsel appearing for informant would submit that material available on record, particularly three suicidal notes clearly indicate that the act of the applicants was of such a nature that it left no option with the deceased than to commit suicide. They also took us through statement of the family members of deceased stating that besides suicide notes, the deceased had stated them about the harassment on the part of the applicants. It is submitted that the applicants were humiliating deceased by making casteist remark and tarnished his self-esteem which led him to commit suicide. Moreover, it is submitted that the material collected during the course of investigation including three suicidal notes and a letter written by deceased to the Inspector General of Police are sufficient to put the applicants at least on trial.
6. Informant Dhanraj is father-in-law of deceased. It is his contention that on 5/4/2017, deceased sent WhatsApp message to his relatives conveying his intention to commit suicide. In-fact, deceased sent WhatsApp images of three handwritten suicide notes to his relatives, expressing his intention to committee suicide due to persistent harassment. The Police have recorded statement of informant, wherein he stated that prior to the occurrence in the month of October 2016 and April 2017 deceased had disclosed that the applicants who are his fellow colleagues were humiliating and harassing him at the instance of caste.
7. Apart from the oral statement of informant and relatives about discloser of harassment, it is essential to go through all the suicide notes whic
Chitresh Kumar Chopra vs. State (Govt.Of NCT of Delhi)
For a charge of abetment of suicide under IPC Section 306, there must be clear evidence of instigation or incitement by the accused, and mere allegations of harassment are insufficient without a dire....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the offense of abetment under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code requires the presence of mens rea and intention on the part of the accused,....
To establish abetment of suicide under IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or intent to drive the deceased to suicide; mere harassment is insufficient.
To establish abetment of suicide, there must be a direct and intentional act by the accused that leads to the suicide, which was not present in this case.
In cases of abetment of suicide, there must be proof of direct or indirect acts of instigation or incitement to commit suicide. Mere allegations of harassment without a positive act proximate to the ....
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or encouragement, which was absent in this case.
For liability under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or active involvement in the suicide, which was absent in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.