M. S. KARNIK
Polynova Industries Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Prem Kumar Bari – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. Heard Mr. Agarwal, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Chawdikar, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The challenge in this appeal by the appellant-employer is to the orders dtd. 11/7/2022 and 20/3/2023 passed by the Commissioner for Employees Compensation, Government of Goa, under the provisions of Employees' Compensation Act, 1926.
3. The respondent no.1-employee was employed through the contractor-respondent no.2, to work in the factory of the petitioneremployer. On 23/1/2013, when the employee was working on machine in the factory of the employer, he met with an accident that took place at 3.30 p.m. The employee suffered crushed injury of his right hand and forearm. The right hand had to be amputated. The employee suffered permanent disablement. On the date of the accident, the employee was 16 years 7 months and 17 days old. The monthly wages payable were Rs.5590.00. The case of the employee before the Commissioner for workmen compensation was that he is entitled to compensation under the provisions of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 ('Compensation Act', for short) for the injury suffered. The employer contested the employee's claim primarily on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.