SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 2159

G. A. SANAP
Ashish – Appellant
Versus
Shraddha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.B.Gandhe, Advocate, M.R.Kalar, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. In this revision application, challenge is to the judgment and order dtd. 27/12/2021, passed by the learned Judge of Family Court No.4, Nagpur, whereby the learned Judge partly allowed the petition filed under Sec. 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by non-applicant no.1 (original petitioner no.1) and directed the applicant (original respondent) to pay a sum of Rs.5, 000.00 per month to non-applicant no.1 (wife) and Rs.3, 000.00 per month to non-applicant no.2 (son) towards maintenance.

2. The facts are follows :

The parties in this revision would be referred to by their nomenclature in the petition filed before the Family Court. The marriage between petitioner no.1 and the respondent took place on 21/2/2017. It is stated by the petitioners that before engagement, the parents of the respondent informed that they do not want dowry. However, few days prior to the marriage, father of the respondent demanded Rs.5, 00, 000.00 towards dowry. Father of petitioner no.1 refused to pay dowry, however he helped them by depositing Rs.2, 50, 000.00 in the bank account of the respondent. It is stated that on the day of the marriage, father of the respondent demanded Rs.5, 00,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top