JITENDRA JAIN, G. S. KULKARNI
Indian Institute of Architects – Appellant
Versus
City And Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to land earmarked for sports complex (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 12 , 16) |
| 2. government's proposal for sports complex relocation (Para 4 , 10 , 15 , 20 , 25) |
| 3. assessment of legal and administrative processes (Para 7 , 24 , 26 , 28 , 29) |
| 4. public interest must take precedence over commercial exploitation of designated lands. (Para 30 , 87 , 88 , 89) |
| 5. court's decision against arbitrary government actions (Para 58 , 66 , 74 , 100 , 116) |
| 6. final order to reinstate land for sports complex (Para 118) |
JUDGMENT
G. S. Kulkarni, J. -
(A) Prelude
1. As to whether vacant land earmarked from the year 2003 for a 'Government Sports Complex' at Navi Mumbai, should be sacrificed for concretization and commercial exploitation, is the issue raised in the present Public Interest Litigation.
2. The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, is before the Court in this public interest litigation, inter alia assailing the actions of respondent No.1 - City Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (for short 'CIDCO') and of the State of Maharashtra through its Sports Department and the Urban Development Department.
3. The subject matter of controversy is land admeasuring about 20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.