Back
G. A. SANAP
Mahadeo @ Mahadya Uttam Gonde – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
In this appeal, challenge is to the judgment and order dated 28.03.2022, passed by the learned Special Judge, Special Court (POCSO), Chandrapur, whereby the learned Judge held the accused guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 4 and 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, “POCSO Act”) and under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, “IPC”). He has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/- and in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offence punishable under Section 4 of the POCSO Act, and rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offence punishable under Section 10 of the POCSO Act. No separate sentence has been awarded for the offence punishable under Section 377 of the IPC.
2] BACKGROUND FACTS:
PW-2 is the victim boy. On his report, a crime was registered against the accused at Gadchandur Police Station, Dist. Chandrapur. The case of prosecution, which can be gathered from the report and other materials, is that, on the date of the incident, the
The necessity of proving penetration or manipulation causing penetration for charges under the POCSO Act was emphasized, leading to a conviction for attempted offences.
The court established that in cases of sexual assault, the victim's testimony can be sufficient for conviction, and that slight penetration constitutes an offense under the POCSO Act, regardless of t....
The judgment established the distinction between rape and sexual assault, emphasizing the requirement of penetration for the former, and the physical contact without penetration for the latter under ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the provisions of the POCSO Act, specifically Section 7 read with Section 8, in determining the guilt of the ....
The absence of penetration is critical for a conviction under Sections 5(i) and 6 of the POCSO Act, but the presence of injuries can still lead to a conviction for aggravated sexual assault under Sec....
The court established that the definitions of sexual assault under the POCSO Act and rape under the IPC are closely aligned, and the presumption of guilt under the POCSO Act places a significant burd....
The reliability of the prosecutrix's testimony and the admissibility of res gestae evidence were central to the court's decision.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of corroborative evidence, such as medical evidence, in establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt in cases of sexual assault. It also underscores the gravity o....
The victim's testimony in sexual assault cases is vital and can suffice for conviction without corroboration, provided it is credible.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
