ANIL L. PANSARE
Guru Nanak Institute of Engineering and Technology – Appellant
Versus
Grievance Committee, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard.
2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission.
3. The petitioner-institution is aggrieved by two interim orders, both dated 06/05/2023, passed by the Grievance Committee, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj, Nagpur University, Nagpur (hereinafter referred to as the “Grievance Committee”) in favour of respondents No.3 in the both petitions in Grievance Petition Nos. 10/2022 and 11/2022 in favour of respondents No.3 in the both petitions.
4. The Grievance Committee has directed the petitioner-institution to release full salary of respondents No.3, from the date on which the period of six months is completed from the date of the suspension of the respondents No.3.
5. As stated earlier, these orders have been passed on 06/05/2023. The respondents No.3 in respective petitions lodged complaint on 16/03/2022 before the Grievance Committee, challenging the orders of suspension passed by the Society which runs the petitioner-institution. The suspension orders were passed on 11/03/2022 and 10/03/2022.
6. The Counsel for petitioner contends that on the date when the Grie
The Grievance Committee's authority is contingent upon valid, approved directions; lapsed directions negate its jurisdiction.
Employees' reliance on Grievance Committee orders necessitates timely compliance by universities under the Maharashtra Public Universities Act; non-implementation results in penalties.
The court emphasized the importance of the Grievance Committee considering and deciding the objection raised by the petitioners regarding the maintainability of the proceedings under the Maharashtra ....
The court affirmed the authority of the Board for Adjudication of Students Grievances to address student disciplinary complaints, emphasizing adherence to statutory procedures established in educatio....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the provisions of Section 17(16) and (17) of the act of 1998 and the determination of the maintainability of the petitioner's....
The principle of natural justice does not apply to the issuance of an order of suspension as it is an ad-interim measure during the pendency of the departmental proceeding.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.