Back
S. G. MEHARE
Rani – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.G. Mehare, J.
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of parties.
2. The petitioners were the duly elected members of the Village Panchayat. They were elected in the month of January 2021. Petitioner no.1 was elected as Sarpanch. Respondent no.7 is the husband of the contested candidate against the panel of petitioners. He had a political rivalry; hence, he made the false complaints against them. On his complaint, an inquiry under Section 39(3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 ('Act of 1959' for short) was initiated. Respondent no.7 alleged against the petitioners that they by misusing the powers prepared a bogus and duplicate Resolution No.5 dated 18.11.2021. They have forged the proceeding book and passed the illegal resolution that complainant obstructed way to the field of villagers and referred it to the Tahasildar. However, the said subject was not in Resolution No.5. The Gram Sevak informed him by letter dated 28.03.2022 that the Village Panchayat has not passed a resolution about road Kapilapuri to Ainapurwadi or of Gut No.21 and 22. The Village Panchayat had no right pass such resolution. Respondent no.4 in complaint was
The court ruled that mere errors or irregularities in the discharge of duties do not constitute misconduct unless they are detrimental to the institution's prestige or involve willful misconduct.
The judgment establishes that actions constituting misconduct under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 should not be condoned, even under the policy of woman empowerment, and removal for pr....
The central legal point established is the interpretation of 'misconduct' under Section 39(1)(i) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and the need for strict construction of removal provi....
Misconduct under Section 39(1)(i) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act requires wrongful intention; mere irregularities without intent do not constitute misconduct.
The removal of a duly elected Sarpanch through the democratic process, was found to be improper.
Disqualification of elected officials under the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act can be upheld based on misconduct linked to their associates, even if direct involvement is not established.
Subjective satisfaction of the Commissioner on disgraceful conduct justifies disqualification without a conviction under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
