SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
Ranjana w/o. Sanjaykumar Landge – Appellant
Versus
Sunita Sanjaykumar Landge – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ganesh V. Mohekar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. P.P. More, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. The present appellants/original petitioners, by way of this appeal, have challenged the judgment dated 15.07.2022 in Misc. Civil Application (MCA) No.381 of 2020 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Ambajogai, District Beed, whereby their application is returned under Order VII Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) for filing it to the Court having proper jurisdiction.

2. The background facts are as under:

The appellants have filed MCA No.381 of 2020 on 11.10.2019 in the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division, Parli-Vaijnath for getting Heirship Certificate in respect of the deceased Sanjaykumar Dattatray Landge under Section VIII of the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, being the legal heirs. The present respondents/original objection petitioners, in response to the paper publication, appeared in the said application and raised the contention by opposing the claim of the present appellants. Since the application was contested, the proceedings were transferred to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Ambajogai.

3. The learned Civil Judge Senior Division i.e. the learned trial Court, by conducting the trial, after adducing evidence by the parties, returned the procee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top