SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANJAY A. DESHMUKH
Shriram S/o Kanhu Kamble (Dead) – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S. V. Ingole, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mrs. Hemlata Dhande, Mr. M. A. Kadu, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. Admit. Heard finally with consent of the learned Advocates for the parties.

2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and award passed by Civil Judge, Senior Division, Darwha, District Yavatmal dated 26.02.2014 in Land Acquisition Case No.2167/2004.

3. The challenge under this appeal is only about constructed area 90.76 sq. mtr., situated at village Kumbharkinhi, Taluka Darwha, District Yavatmal was acquired for public purpose under Kumbharkini Project. Under the same project, other lands as well as constructed houses were acquired under the same notification and same purposes.

4. Learned Advocate for the appellant is relying upon the judgment passed by this Court in First Appeal No.364/2016 (Ganesh Pundlik Deeve Vs. Executive Engineer, Kumbharkinhi Dam Division Pusad, Tq. Pusad Distt. Yavatmal and others) dated 22.02.2021, wherein this Court after considering evidence and parity, enhanced the compensation regarding constructed structure of the same village at the rate of Rs.3200/- per sq. mtr. The learned Advocate for the appellant submitted that house of appellant is similarly situated with the house in First Appeal No.364/2016. He, therefore, prayed to award the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top