Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
N. J. JAMADAR, J
Shree Educational Trust – Appellant
Versus
Dombivali Shikshan Prasarak Mandal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendants' claim to file (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 3. court's ruling on written statement (Para 27 , 28) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, heard finally at the stage of admission.
3. Shorn of unnecessary details, background facts leading to this petition can be stated as under:-
3.2 Disputes arose over the performance of the terms of the said agreement between the plaintiff and defendant No. 1. On 24th April, 2015 the plaintiff terminated the said agreement dated 20th July, 2012 and revoked the license granted to defendant No. 1 to operate the said school, w.e.f. 5th May, 2015.
3.4 The defendants appeared in response to the suit summons. Various interlocutory applications were filed in the said suit.
3.6 On 30th March, 2019 an application was filed on behalf of the defendants to condone the delay in filing the written statement sans the signatures of the defendants. In the month of April, 2019, the defendants, filed application to permit the defendants to file the written statement by condoning the dela
Defendants cannot file an additional written statement to an amended plaint if their right to do so has been previously forfeited, as per the Code of Civil Procedure.
The right to file an additional written statement is contingent upon amendments in the plaint and must not introduce new claims, as established by prior court orders.
Under Order VIII Rule 9 CPC, leave for additional written statement denied if sought to retract clear admissions in original, as it prejudices plaintiff by substituting new case; counsel inadvertence....
An amendment to a joint written statement cannot be made by one defendant without the consent of all other defendants who signed it, to avoid prejudice to their rights.
Failures in due diligence and attempts to withdraw admissions in pleadings preclude amendments in civil suits post-evidence closure.
Amendments to written statements must not cause severe prejudice to the opposing party, especially when sought after a party's death.
A categorical admission made in the pleadings cannot be permitted to be withdrawn by way of an amendment. The attempt to change the entire stand from denying the execution of the agreement to admitti....
The court established that amendments to written statements can be allowed post-trial commencement if they clarify existing facts and do not prejudice the opposing party.
Amendments to pleadings after the commencement of trial are restricted and require demonstration of due diligence to be permitted.
A trial court may allow filing of an additional written statement under Order 8 Rule 9 of CPC when trial has not commenced, emphasizing judicial discretion and the need to avoid prejudice in litigati....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
