IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J
Rekha W/o Baban Naik - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India, Through - Respondent
FIRST APPEAL NO. 873 OF 2023
Decided On : 25-02-2025
(A) Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123(c) and 124-A - Claim for compensation due to death in an untoward incident - Claim dismissed as deceased not a bona fide passenger and death not resulting from an untoward incident - Evidence from railway motorman and guard established that deceased was knocked down while trespassing tracks - Appellant's evidence insufficient to prove valid ticket or bona fide passenger status. (Paras 1, 8, 18, 24)
(B) Investigation Procedure - Railway Passengers (Manner of Investigation of Untoward Incidents) Rules, 2020 - Requirement for timely investigation and reporting of incidents - Delay in report submission does not invalidate findings if investigation conducted. (Paras 21, 22)
Facts of the case:
The appeal arises from a claim for compensation following the death of the deceased, who allegedly fell from a train while holding a valid ticket. The Railways contended that the deceased was trespassing and not a bona fide passenger. (Paras 1-3)
Findings of Court:
The court found that the deceased was not a bona fide passenger and that the death did not occur as a result of an untoward incident, dismissing the claim. (Paras 18, 24)
Issues: The main issues were whether the death was due to an untoward incident and whether the deceased was a bona fide passenger. (Paras 12, 24)
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the evidence from railway officials was credible and established that the deceased was not a bona fide passenger, thus the claim for compensation was dismissed. (Paras 18, 24)
Result: First Appeal stands dismissed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident details (Para 2) |
| 2. railways' defense (Para 3) |
| 3. appellant's testimony (Para 4) |
| 4. cross-examination admissions (Para 5) |
| 5. witness testimonies (Para 6 , 7) |
| 6. trial court's findings (Para 8) |
| 7. appellant's counsel submissions (Para 9) |
| 8. respondent's counsel submissions (Para 10 , 11) |
| 9. points for determination (Para 12) |
| 10. court's ruling (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This First Appeal is at the instance of original Applicant whose claim for grant of compensation on the ground of death of her son in an incident which occurred on 9th July 2018 has been dismissed by the Railway Claims Tribunal vide impugned judgment dated 8th March 2023 passed in Application No.14 of 2019.
2. The contention in the Claim Application was that on 9th July 2018, the deceased was travelling from Thane to Kopar by local train in second class compartment holding a valid second class railway ticket and when the local train had reached near KM 46/10 and 46/11 between Kopar Railway Station and Diva Railway Station, due to push from the crowd, the deceased accidentally fell down from the train and sustained injuries and expired. It was pleaded that deceased was travelling from Thane to Kopar holding a valid second class return railway ticket from Kopar to Thane but the said ticket was lost in the untoward incident.
3. The defence of Respondent-Railways was that the statutory investigation report dated 18th December 2019 prepared by Mumbai Division reflects that deceased was knocked down by a train while trespassing the tracks on 9th July 2018 at about 21.40 hours between Kopar and Diva stations on Up Line at KM No.46/10 – 46/11 and that the victim was found lying on up / through track. It was denied that deceased was a bona fide passenger as no valid ticket was recovered upon search by GRPF from the body of deceased.
4. The Applicant examined herself and deposed as per the contents of her Application. She deposed that on 9th July 2018, the deceased had purchased second class railway return ticket from Kopar to Thane in her presence and thereafter both boarded local train in different compartments. She has deposed that both alighted at Thane Station and the deceased told her that he was going to meet Mukadam for some work and she left for her work. She has further deposed that on 9th July 2018, deceased started his return journey by local train from Thane to Kopar holding a valid second class railway ticket and when the train reached between Kopar and Diva stations, the deceased fell down from train. She has deposed that ticket was lost during the course of untoward incident. She has further deposed that on 10th July 2018 when she reached home, her son was not at home and after 5 to 6 days she lodged a missing complaint with Ramnagar Police Station, Dombivali East. She has deposed that on 14th August 2018 she had gone to Dombivali Railway Police Station to make inquiry and at that time she was informed that deceased had fallen down from running train. In support of her deposition, she has produced the true copies of station master’s memo, inquest panchnama, post mortem report, photocopies of ration card, Aadhar card and bank passbook.
5. In the cross examination, she has admitted that she had seen the deceased at Thane at about 8.00 p.m. and thereafter he left to meet his mukaram and did not return home for about 20 days. She has admitted that copy of missing complaint filed by her is not available with her. She has stated that after a period of 10 days she was called by Dombivali Railway police to identify the photograph of deceased and nothing was recovered from the possession of deceased.
6. Respondent–Railways examined the motorman of Train No.S-52 and the guard of Train No.S-52. The motorman has deposed that on 9th July 2018 when his train was passing between Kopar and Diva, he suddenly saw a person standing on the up/through track and that he immediately applied the emergency break and b
The court established that a deceased must be a bona fide passenger to claim compensation under the Railways Act, and evidence of trespassing negates such status.
The mere absence of a journey ticket does not negate a claim of being a bona fide passenger under the Railways Act, as the initial burden lies on the claimants and shifts to the Railways to disprove ....
The court established that a bona fide passenger's accidental fall from a train constitutes an 'untoward incident' under the Railways Act, entitling the victim's family to compensation, regardless of....
Claimants must prove all relevant facts to establish entitlement to compensation under the Railways Act; mere deposition is insufficient without corroborating evidence.
The absence of a ticket does not disqualify a deceased from being considered a bona fide passenger under the Railways Act, and incidents leading to death can be classified as untoward incidents warra....
Compensation claims under the Railways Act for untoward incidents require proving bona fide passenger status; absence of valid tickets and unauthorized track presence negate claims.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.