SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 1059

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
MOHD. FIROJ HASIM SHAIKH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

[MILIND N. JADHAV, J.]

1. Heard Mr. Jadhav, learned Advocate for Applicant in Bail Application No.1490 of 2024; Mr. Shaikh, learned Advocate for Applicant in Bail Application No.1408 of 2024; Mr. Thekkara, learned Advocate for Applicant in Bail Application No.2018 of 2024; Mr. Haldankar, learned APP for Respondent – State in Bail Application No.1490 of 2024 and Bail Application No. 1408 of 2024; Mr. Kulkarni, learned APP for Respondent – State in Bail Application No.2018 of 2024; Ms. Lodha, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 in Bail Application No.1490 of 2024 and Bail Application No. 1408 of 2024 and Mr. Patil, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 in Bail Application No.2018 of 2024.

2. All three Bail Applications are decided by this common order since First Informant is common in all three Applications as also period of occurrence of the alleged offences in all three Applications is overlapping each other and most importantly indictment of all three Applicants before me is under identical Sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1490 OF 2024

3. Bail Application No.1490 of 2024 is file

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top