Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
REVATI MOHITE DERE, NEELA GOKHALE
Eknath Krishna Kadam – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Neela Gokhale, J.
1. The Appellant assails the Judgment and Order dated 10th December 2009 passed by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai in Sessions Case No. 778 of 2008. By the impugned Judgment and Order, the Appellant stands convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’), 1860. For the offence punishable under Section 302 of the IPC, for committing the murder of Anil Vaswani, he is sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and pay fine of Rs. 300/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment (‘RI’) for three months. For the offence punishable under Section 397 of the IPC, he is sentenced to suffer RI for seven years and pay fine of Rs. 400/-, in default to suffer RI for four months. Both the sentences are to run concurrently. The Appellant is in jail from 11th August 2008 and is held to be entitled to a set off for the said period already undergone.
2. The facts leading to the present Appeal are as follows:
2.1 The Complainant, one Harsha Vaswani (PW/1) was residing with her two younger sisters and father, Anil Vaswani (deceased) at Khoja Lane, Versova, Andheri, Mumbai. Her mother is pre-deceased. Harsha a
The last seen theory, combined with circumstantial evidence, establishes guilt beyond reasonable doubt in murder and robbery cases.
The court confirmed that circumstantial evidence, particularly the last seen theory, can establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt when supported by consistent and corroborative evidence.
Conviction for murder barred by insufficient evidence; last seen theory alone lacks definitive proof, reinforcing the standard that circumstantial proof must connect the accused to the crime.
Convictions under circumstantial evidence require a complete and unbroken chain of proof; mere suspicion is insufficient for establishing guilt.
A conviction based on circumstantial evidence requires a complete chain of evidence that excludes all reasonable hypotheses of innocence.
The last seen theory and circumstantial evidence are crucial in establishing guilt in murder cases, particularly when direct evidence is lacking.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
