Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE URMILA SACHIN JOSHI- PHALKE
Dhanesh Puri Guru Prem Puri – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.
1. By this appeal, the appellant (accused) has challenged judgment and order dated 17.3.2023 passed by learned Special Judge (NDPS Court), Nagpur (learned Judge of the trial court) in NDPS Special Case No.24/2017.
2. By the judgment impugned in the appeal, the accused is convicted for offence under Section 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (the NDPS Act) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and to pay fine Rs.25000/- in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months.
3. Brief facts of the prosecution case emerged from the police papers and recorded evidence are as under:
The report is lodged by PSI Datta Pendke, who was night duty officer on 1.2.2017 at Railway Police Station (RPF), Nagpur. At about 8:54 am, on 2.2.2017, PSI Bose of RPF Nagpur submitted a letter that the accused, resident of Lonawala, taluka Khandala, district Pune, is travelling in Vishakhapatnam-Nijamuddin Express by illegally possessing contraband “Ganja” in his bag. Therefore, the accused has been intercepted by conducting a raid in bogie where the accused was sitting. The search was offered by the RPF Officers to the accu
Conscious possession must be established for conviction under the NDPS Act; mere proximity to contraband is insufficient.
The prosecution must establish conscious possession beyond reasonable doubt in NDPS cases.
Point of law: While upholding the constitutional validity of sections 35 and 54 of the NDPS Act, the Apex Court has, however, reiterated that more serious the offence, the stricter would be the degre....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the presumption of culpable mental state and possession under Section 35 and 54 of the NDPS Act, and the court's reliance on the prosecution's evid....
As per section 55 of Act of 1985, police is required to take charge of articles seized or delivered and keep in safe custody pending order of Magistrate.
The mandatory requirements under Section 50 of the NDPS Act must be strictly followed to ensure an individual's rights during searches; failure to comply renders any recovery and subsequent convictio....
The court found the accused guilty of possession of Ganja based on consistent evidence from witnesses and dismissed the appeal.
The court affirmed that possession of 201 kilograms of ganja established under the NDPS Act sufficed for conviction, confirming that procedural safeguards were adhered to despite the absence of indep....
Possession of narcotic substances can result in conviction under NDPS despite procedural non-compliance if evidentiary strength supports prosecution's claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
