SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1204

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 
G.S. KULKARNI, ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ.
Chetan Chandrakant Ahire - Appellant
Versus
Union of India, through Department of Legal Affairs - Respondent 
Writ Petition No. 1402 of 2025
Decided On : 25-06-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Prakash Ambedkar, Hitendra Gandhi, Ajay Gaikwad, Priyadarshi Telang, Sarwajeet Bansode, Sandesh More
For the Respondents: Uday Warunjikar, Jenish Jain, Ashutosh Kumbhakoni, Akshay Shinde, Sachindra Shetye, Akshay Pansare, Y.D. Patil

The assertion of illegal votes without substantial evidence fails to establish a justiciable claim; a petitioner must first demand justice from relevant authorities before seeking judicial intervention under Article 226.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Challenge to entire election of Maharashtra State Legislative Assembly - Petitioner's claims based on alleged illegal votes cast after designated polling hours without data from the Election Commission - Court found lack of a lawful cause of action and held petitioner had no locus standi in challenging the entire State election. (Paras 1, 14, 15, 16, 20)

(B) Jurisdiction - Conditions for maintainability of writ under Article 226 - Requirement of demand for justice from authorities before approaching the Court, lack of such demand resulted in dismissal of the petition - The petition judged as frivolous and lacking substantive evidence. (Paras 15, 16, 22)

(C) Election Process - Inclusion of votes cast without procedural compliance cannot undermine election results without substantial evidence - Court emphasized the necessity for credible claims to support challenges against election outcomes - The integrity of electronic voting machines (EVMs) reaffirmed, challenges based on suspicion alone dismissed. (Paras 25-30)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, primarily based on a Right to Information (RTI) response indicating the absence of data on votes cast after closing time, challenged the validity of the entire election held in November 2024, claiming a Constitutional failure without providing previous representations to authorities for rectification.

Findings of Court:
The petition lacked a valid legal ground and was dismissed due to insufficient evidence and absence of necessary pre-litigation steps, highlighting the principle of free and fair elections being purely statutory rights.

Issues: Whether the petitioner had the locus standi to challenge the entire election results based on alleged procedural lapses regarding voting.

Ratio Decidendi: The court underscored that a demand for justice must precede legal redress and reaffirmed the role of evidence in election integrity, dismissing claims based solely on suspicion rather than facts.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenges to election results must substantiate voting irregularities. (Para 1 , 3)
2. the absence of a demand for justice undermines legal standing. (Para 5 , 6)
3. judicial review over elections is limited by statutory procedures. (Para 10 , 11)
4. petitions filed on mere suspicions are not maintainable in constitutional courts. (Para 14 , 16)
5. (Para 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT :

G.S. Kulkarni, J.

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying for very wide and peculiar reliefs inter alia challenging the entire election of the Maharashtra State Legislative Assembly held by the Election Commission of India (for short “the ECI”), on 20 November 2024, the results of which were declared on 24 November 2024. It is prayed that the elections on the grounds as urged in the petition be declared to be null and void. Apart from the prayers for a mandamus for certain disclosure of information by the ECI, there are prayers made in the writ petition inter alia for issuance of a writ of mandamus to declare the results of the elections of each Assembly Constituencies issued by the Returning Officers as null and void, for the alleged non-compliance of the established legal provisions, procedural lapses, and irregularities in the electoral process. There is also a prayer for a relief that a writ of mandamus be issued for immediate withdrawal of the certificates of election issued by the Returning Officers of each constituency, as such certifications lack legitimacy, on account of procedural violations and discrepancies in the conduct of elections. The canvass of the thirteen prayers as made in the petition needs to be noted, which read thus:-

“(a) By an appropriate writ, order, or direction, including a writ of mandamus, this Hon'ble Court may direct Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to provide a detailed disclosure before this Hon'ble Court regarding the exact number of tokens distributed to voters after the official closing time (i.e., after 6:00 PM) at each polling station, along with the cumulative total of tokens distributed across all Assembly Constituency segments.

(b) By an appropriate writ, order, or direction, including a writ of mandamus, this Hon'ble Court may direct Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to provide a comprehensive and detailed disclosure before this Hon'ble Court regarding the total number of votes cast and polled in each constituency of the State of Maharashtra between 5:00 PM and 6:00 PM on 20/11/2024, ensuring accuracy and accountability in the electoral process.

(c) By an appropriate writ, order, or direction, including a writ of mandamus, this Hon'ble Court may direct Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to provide a comprehensive disclosure of the total number of votes cast and polled in each constituency of the State of Maharashtra after 6:00 PM until the final closing time of polling on 20/11/2024.

(d) By an appropriate writ, order, or direction, including a writ of mandamus, this Hon'ble Court may declare the entire election process as void and illegal in the event of failure by Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to produce or disclose, with accuracy and transparency, the number of tokens distributed to each voter at each polling station and the cumulative total of tokens distributed across all Assembly Constituency segments. Such failure constitutes a gross non-compliance with the provisions of the Act, the Rules, the guidelines, and directions established under the law, thereby undermining the sanctity of the electoral process.

(e) By an appropriate writ, order, or direction, including a writ of mandamus, this Hon'ble Court may declare as null and void the results declared by the respective Returning Officers of each Assembly Constituency due to the non-compliance with established legal provisions, procedural lapses, and irregularities in the electoral process.

(f) By an appropriate writ, order, or direction, including a writ of mandamus, this Hon'ble Court may direct the immediate withdrawal of the certificates of e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top